PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Waste Management· 2026Q1

Precision sorting of municipal solid waste using dynamic disc screen

Akashdeep S. Oberoi, Yu Zhang, Ling Ding, Yingqian Lin et al.

Short summary

A dynamic disc screen (DDS) achieved 77.8–99.0% purity of organic fraction of MSW (OFMSW) fines and 85.7–95.5% plastic decontamination efficiency, outperforming vibratory and trommel screens for MSW pre-screening.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Dynamic disc screen (DDS) achieved OFMSW purity of 77.8–99.0% and plastic decontamination of 85.7–95.5%.
  • Vibratory screening yielded 45.6% OFMSW purity and 63.1% recovery.
  • Trommel screening achieved 70.5% OFMSW purity but only 20.6% recovery.
  • DDS demonstrated operational stability with a larger waste mass (~1,672 kg).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) represents a large, low-cost biomass resource for bioenergy and bioproduct production. However, its heterogeneity and compositional variability limit its direct use as a conversion-ready feedstock. This study evaluated three mechanical pre-screening technologies vibratory screening, trommel screening, and a dynamic disc screen (DDS) for the recovery of the organic fraction of MSW (OFMSW), and removal of plastic contaminants from unprocessed black bag MSW. All systems separated MSW into fines and overs fractions based on particle size and density, with compositional analysis confirming enrichment of biodegradable organics in the fines and preferential concentration of plastics in the overs. Vibratory screening produced an organic fines fraction with 45.6% purity and 63.1% OFMSW recovery, whereas trommel screening achieved higher purity (70.5%) but substantially lower recovery (20.6%) on a dry basis. In contrast, DDS screening produced high-purity fines, with OFMSW purity ranging from 77.8% to 99.0% and OFMSW recovery varying between 25.3% and 99.1% across five batches. Across all DDS batches, plastic decontamination efficiency remained high (85.7–95.5%), demonstrating robust contaminant removal over a range of feed compositions and operating conditions. Extended operation using a larger waste mass (∼1,672 kg) further demonstrated the operational stability of the DDS under the tested conditions. The higher motor-speed condition was associated with lower OFMSW recovery in the fines fraction, suggesting a potential influence of motor speed on DDS separation performance. Overall, DDS-based mechanical pre-screening offers a scalable and effective approach for producing high-purity, low-contaminant OFMSW with the potential for downstream biochemical valorization and sustainable MSW management.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Waste Management, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Waste Management and DisposalEnvironmental Science