PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Medical Image Analysis· 2016Q1

A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms

Ching‐Wei Wang, Cheng-Ta Huang, Jia‐Hong Lee, Chung-Hsing Li et al.

Short summary

A novel framework and benchmark dataset for objectively evaluating automatic dental radiography analysis algorithms have been established, comparing seven cephalometric X-ray analysis methods and two bitewing caries detection methods.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Established a novel framework and benchmark for objective evaluation of dental radiography analysis algorithms.
  • Created datasets for dental anatomy (bitewing radiographs) and abnormality classification (cephalometric radiographs).
  • Defined objective quantitative evaluation metrics for comparing and ranking algorithms.
  • Compared seven automatic cephalometric X-ray analysis methods and two bitewing caries detection methods.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Dental radiography plays an important role in clinical diagnosis, treatment and surgery. In recent years, efforts have been made on developing computerized dental X-ray image analysis systems for clinical usages. A novel framework for objective evaluation of automatic dental radiography analysis algorithms has been established under the auspices of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2015 Bitewing Radiography Caries Detection Challenge and Cephalometric X-ray Image Analysis Challenge. In this article, we present the datasets, methods and results of the challenge and lay down the principles for future uses of this benchmark. The main contributions of the challenge include the creation of the dental anatomy data repository of bitewing radiographs, the creation of the anatomical abnormality classification data repository of cephalometric radiographs, and the definition of objective quantitative evaluation for comparison and ranking of the algorithms. With this benchmark, seven automatic methods for analysing cephalometric X-ray image and two automatic methods for detecting bitewing radiography caries have been compared, and detailed quantitative evaluation results are presented in this paper. Based on the quantitative evaluation results, we believe automatic dental radiography analysis is still a challenging and unsolved problem. The datasets and the evaluation software will be made available to the research community, further encouraging future developments in this field. (http://www-o.ntust.edu.tw/~cweiwang/ISBI2015/).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Medical Image Analysis, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Oral Surgery

Oral SurgeryDentistry