BMC Medical Education· 2026Q1
Is our future ready for the future? Investigating speech and language therapy students’ literacy and awareness of artificial intelligence: a descriptive and correlational study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Speech-Language Therapy (SLT) students show high AI literacy but a weak correlation between technical use and ethical awareness, with over 70% excited about AI enhancing professional skills.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- SLT students demonstrate high AI literacy scores across all subscales.
- Strong positive correlation (ρ = .702) exists between AI 'Use' and 'Evaluation' skills.
- Weak correlation (ρ = .225) between AI 'Ethics' and 'Use' highlights a disconnect in ethical awareness.
- Over 70% of students are excited about AI's potential to enhance professional skills.
- Senior students express greater concern about AI's impact on future SLT job demand.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Although AI awareness is increasing in health and education, research specifically focused on Speech-Language Therapy (SLT) remains limited. This study investigated the knowledge, awareness, and literacy levels of SLT students regarding AI, examining the influence of academic year and prior coursework on these variables. A total of 412 undergraduate SLT students (M age = 21.5, SD = 3.43; 366 F, 45 M) from various universities in Türkiye participated. Data were collected via the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale and the Artificial Intelligence Awareness Survey. Analysis included descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests for grade-level comparisons, and Mann-Whitney U tests for prior AI exposure. Spearman correlation and Chi-square tests examined relationships between subscales and categorical variables. Participants demonstrated high overall AI literacy scores, with no significant differences across grade levels. Strong positive correlations were observed among all subscales of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale, particularly between “Use” and “Evaluation” (ρ = .702, p < .001), indicating that higher usage levels relate to better output assessment. Conversely, a weak correlation between “Ethics” and “Use” ( ρ = .225, p < .001) suggested that technical proficiency does not necessarily correspond with ethical awareness. In the awareness survey, a notable proportion of participants remained neutral on several items; however, over 70% expressed excitement about AI advancements and agreed that AI would enhance their professional skills. SLT students generally possess a considerable level of AI literacy but exhibit caution and uncertainty regarding its clinical integration. This hesitancy suggests that students perceive their current knowledge as insufficient for practical application. The findings underscore the need to integrate structured AI curricula into SLT education, with a focus on professional and ethical dimensions. Notably, senior students expressed stronger concerns about AI's potential impact on future demand for SLT services, highlighting the importance of fostering AI literacy and addressing career-related apprehensions to better prepare students for future clinical practice.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Medical Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Health Informatics
Health InformaticsMedicine