Annals of Hematology· 2026Q2
Evaluating the effectiveness of the eHealth-faciLitated SMILe–integrated care model on treatment burden, quality of life and graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: results of two European randomized controlled implementation studies
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
An eHealth-facilitated integrated care model (SMILe–ICM) reduced patient treatment burden and the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) by 46% following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) compared to usual care.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The SMILe–ICM intervention significantly lowered patient treatment burden across five dimensions.
- Acute GvHD incidence was 46% lower in the SMILe–ICM group (34.2%) compared to usual care (55.3%).
- Quality of life improved over time in both intervention and usual care groups, with no significant between-group differences.
- Chronic GvHD rates did not differ significantly between the SMILe–ICM and usual care groups.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The SMILe Integrated Care Model (SMILe–ICM) has previously demonstrated feasibility, successful implementation, and promising effects on survival, re-hospitalization, and cost-effectiveness following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). To complement these findings and provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the intervention’s effects, we evaluated patient-reported and clinical secondary outcomes from two RCTs. Data from two hybrid effectiveness-implementation RCTs conducted at two European alloSCT centers (Germany, Switzerland) were analyzed. Adult alloSCT recipients were randomized 1:1 to usual care (UCG) or the SMILe–ICM, a multicomponent intervention combining eHealth with advanced practice nurse-led self-management support. Treatment burden was assessed using the Patients’ Experience of Treatment and Self-Management (PETS 2.0), HRQoL using the EQ-5D-5 L, and GvHD outcomes using EBMT-registry data. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach. The current study examined data from 152 patients (76 SMILe–ICM, 76 UCG). Treatment burden was lower in the SMILe–ICM group, with significant differences in five dimensions. Both groups’ HRQoL improved over time without significant between-group differences. The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD was lower in the SMILe–ICM group than in the UCG (34.2% vs. 55.3%; HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.88; p = 0.01); chronic GvHD did not differ significantly ( p = 0.64). SMILe–ICM reduced treatment burden and was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of grades II–IV acute GvHD, while HRQoL and chronic GvHD did not differ significantly between groups. The acute GvHD finding warrants further investigation to determine whether and through which pathways integrated APN-led survivorship care may influence post-alloSCT clinical outcomes.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Annals of Hematology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hematology
HematologyMedicine