Frontiers in Neuroscience· 2026Q2
The mammalian regulatory architecture: biobehavioral portals and the organization of physiological state
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
The Mammalian Regulatory Architecture (MRA) framework proposes that mammalian evolution integrated conserved regulatory processes with specializations like nursing and social communication, creating 'biobehavioral portals' that influence physiological state and adaptive function.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The Mammalian Regulatory Architecture (MRA) is a new organizational framework for understanding neuromodulation.
- MRA integrates conserved regulatory processes with mammalian specializations (e.g., nursing, social communication).
- The framework introduces 'biobehavioral portals' to distinguish the pathway of neuromodulatory engagement from its functional impact.
- This model explains how different biological routes can yield overlapping adaptive outcomes by influencing state-regulating processes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Introduction Neuromodulatory interventions can produce overlapping adaptive outcomes despite engaging substantially different biological pathways. Pathway-centered approaches identify how interventions initially engage the nervous system and characterize pathway-specific mechanisms. Convergence across interventions raises an additional question: how can different biological routes influence overlapping domains of adaptive function? Methods This conceptual paper develops the Mammalian Regulatory Architecture (MRA), an organizational framework informed by identified mammalian synapomorphies (shared derived characteristics) and comparative anatomical, developmental, physiological, and functional observations. Results The MRA hypothesizes that mammalian evolution reorganized relationships among conserved regulatory processes through their integration with mammalian specializations and regulatory demands associated with nursing, prolonged developmental dependency, caregiving, co-regulation, and reciprocal social communication. The framework provides the basis for a biological portal model of neuromodulation that distinguishes the pathway of initial engagement from the functional significance of that engagement within the broader regulatory architecture. Whereas the pathway identifies how an intervention initially engages the nervous system, its portal significance concerns how that engagement influences state-regulating processes within the MRA. Discussion The proposed framework reframes neuromodulation from a process defined primarily by its neural target or pathway to one in which pathway engagement may influence broader regulatory organization, physiological state, Accessibility—the state-dependent availability of existing adaptive capacities—and adaptive function. It offers an organizational account of how distinct biological routes may influence overlapping domains of adaptive function.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Behavioral Neuroscience
Behavioral NeuroscienceNeuroscience