BMC Nursing· 2026Q1
Nursing practice environment and time management behaviours among nurses: a cross-sectional study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A positive nursing practice environment is strongly linked to better time management among nurses (r=0.786), even after accounting for demographics.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A positive nursing practice environment was strongly associated with better time management behaviors among 432 nurses (r=0.786).
- This association persisted after adjusting for demographic factors including gender, nationality, marital status, age, education, and experience.
- Higher scores on the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) correlated with higher reported time management scores.
- Educational level was the only demographic factor significantly associated with both practice environment and time management in unadjusted comparisons.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Effective time management is central to nursing workflow, prioritisation, coordination, and timely care. Organisational characteristics of the nursing practice environment may be associated with nurses’ ability to manage competing clinical demands; however, evidence examining this relationship in Saudi Arabia remains limited. This study examined the nursing practice environments and the time management behaviours among registered nurses and determined whether their association persists after adjustment for relevant participant characteristics. A descriptive-correlational cross-sectional study was conducted among 432 registered nurses recruited through convenience sampling from three public hospitals in Saudi Arabia between February and April 2025. Participants completed a study-specific modified 28-item configuration of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) and the 17-item Nursing Time Management Scale (NTMS). Descriptive statistics, group comparisons with effect sizes and robust alternatives where appropriate, Pearson correlation with 95% confidence intervals, and multivariable linear regression with HC3 robust standard errors were used. The overall study-specific modified PES-NWI mean was 3.67 ± 0.96, and the NTMS mean was 3.63 ± 1.07. Educational level was the only demographic characteristic significantly associated with both outcomes in unadjusted comparisons (PES-NWI: F = 8.796, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.039; NTMS: Welch F = 11.715, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.048). PES-NWI and NTMS scores were strongly correlated ( r = 0.786, 95% CI [0.747, 0.819], p < 0.001). After adjustment for gender, nationality, marital status, age, educational level, and years of experience, PES-NWI remained strongly associated with NTMS (B = 0.864, HC3 SE = 0.037, standardized β = 0.775, 95% CI [0.790, 0.937], p < 0.001; adjusted R 2 = 0.620). Higher scores on the study-specific modified PES-NWI were strongly associated with higher reported time management behaviour scores, even after adjustment for measured demographic characteristics. Because the modified PES-NWI lacks validated interpretive cut-offs and both constructs were assessed concurrently using self-report measures, the findings should not be interpreted as establishing normative practice-environment categories or causal relationships.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Nursing, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Research and TheoryNursing