PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy· 2012Q1

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Shorter Walk Test Compared With the 10-Meter Walk Test for Measurements of Gait Speed in Healthy, Older Adults

Denise M. Peters, Stacy L. Fritz, Debra Krotish

Short summary

A 4-Meter Walk Test shows excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.96-0.98) but is not interchangeable with the 10-Meter Walk Test for gait speed in healthy older adults, with Bland-Altman analysis revealing a discrepancy of ±0.15 to ±0.17 m/s.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Both 4- and 10-Meter Walk Tests show excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.96-0.98) in healthy older adults.
  • Stopwatch and automatic timers yield highly reliable gait speed measurements (ICC 0.99-1.00).
  • A discrepancy of ±0.15 to ±0.17 m/s exists between 4- and 10-Meter Walk Test gait speed measurements.
  • The 4-Meter Walk Test is not sufficiently valid to be used interchangeably with the 10-Meter Walk Test.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Walking speed is associated with several health-related outcomes. Research examining how differences in test walking distance affect walking speed reliability and validity is limited. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and concurrent validity of gait speed measurements obtained from a 4-Meter Walk Test compared with the commonly used 10-Meter Walk Test. A second objective was to similarly examine 2 different timing methods: stopwatch and automatic timers. METHODS: Forty-three healthy, older adults (mean age = 84.3 ± 6.9 years) performed 3 consecutive walking trials on the 4- and 10-Meter Walk Tests at their self-selected walking speed. RESULTS: Gait speed measurements for both tests were shown to have excellent test-retest reliability (ICC values of 0.96-0.98), with similar results for stopwatch and automatic timer assessments (ICC values of 0.99-1.00). Standard error of the measurement (SEM) values were small (0.004-0.008 m/s) across measurement methods. While the ICC value for gait speed measurements between the 2 walk tests was 0.93, the Bland-Altman analysis revealed a discrepancy of ±0.15 to ±0.17 m/s between measurement methods. DISCUSSION: Both 4- and 10-m gait speed assessments had excellent test-retest reliability with similar SEM and minimal detectable change values. There was little difference in SEM values between the 2 timing methods. While the mean difference in gait speed between the 4- and 10-Meter Walk Tests was small, the range of the measurement differences was large enough to potentially mask meaningful changes in gait speed over time if both methods were used interchangeably. CONCLUSIONS: While the reliability of both walking tests is excellent, the 4-Meter Walk Test does not exhibit a high enough degree of concurrent validity with the 10-Meter Walk Test to be used interchangeably for gait speed assessments in healthy, older adults. We therefore recommend using the 10-Meter Walk Test to obtain the most valid clinical assessment of walking speed when using it as a 1-time indicator of health status.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationHealth Professions