PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Public Health· 2026Q1

VACtívate: a proposal targeting conscious decision-making regarding vaccination in 20 cities in Colombia

Laura Juliana Valderrama-Orbegozo, Laura Julieth Ramíerz-Lasprilla, Diana Estefanny Arce Leonel, Michell Rezene Tesfamariam-Ortega et al.

Short summary

The VACtívate psychoeducational intervention, a 12-hour course delivered in 20 Colombian cities, significantly increased participants' global learning scores regarding vaccination by 60% (r_rb = 0.60, p < 0.001).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The VACtívate intervention significantly increased global learning scores related to vaccination by 60% (r_rb = 0.60, p < 0.001) in a pre-post assessment.
  • A total of 716 participants from 20 Colombian cities completed the 12-hour psychoeducational course.
  • Participants identified personal, family, emotional, work, and social factors as key determinants for vaccination decisions.
  • The intervention highlighted the importance of community leadership, intersectoral collaboration, and co-creation of strategies to combat disinformation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy remains a public health challenge. Several authors point to the need for strategies that strengthen confidence in vaccines, informed decision-making and social responsibility, in addition to improving vaccination coverage. Drawing on the findings of the AderVax project, VACtívate was designed as a psychoeducational intervention aimed at health personnel, community leaders, health authorities and social communicators. VACtívate is a 12-hour in-person course implemented in 20 cities in Colombia. The course comprised four modules: vaccine education, decision-making in vaccination, the role of influential agents, and the integration of public health proposals. A total of 716 people took part. Questionnaires were administered before and after the intervention, and perceptions were gathered through open-ended questions. The data were analysed using SPSS and ATLAS.ti. A significant increase in global learning scores was observed between the pre- and post-intervention assessments (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: W = 2,099, Z = − 6.31, p < 0.001; r_rb = 0.60). Participants identified personal, family, emotional, work-related and social factors as determinants of the decision to be vaccinated. They also highlighted the relevance of community leadership, intersectoral work and the co-creation of strategies to counter disinformation and strengthen confidence in vaccines. Following the implementation of VACtívate, participants showed an increase in knowledge scores in the pre–post assessment. While these changes cannot be attributed solely to the intervention, the findings highlight the relevance of culturally appropriate public health proposals adapted to territorial needs and developed with the participation of diverse social and institutional actors.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Public Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health

HealthSocial Sciences