Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics· 2026Q1
Alternative and augmentative communication assessment for complex communication needs: Form development and SLT perspectives in Turkey
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new, comprehensive Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) assessment form, piloted with 26 individuals with complex communication needs (CCN) and evaluated by 9 speech and language therapists (SLTs), was found to enhance clinician confidence and promote systematic AAC practices in Turkey.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A new AAC assessment form was developed and evaluated in Turkey.
- The form was piloted with 26 individuals with diverse CCN diagnoses.
- Nine SLTs with varying AAC experience participated in qualitative interviews.
- Clinicians predominantly used informal methods for AAC assessment prior to the form.
- The form was perceived as inclusive, guiding, and supportive by SLTs.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Individuals with complex communication needs (CCN) benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, yet these benefits depend on comprehensive and accurate assessment to guide system selection. AAC assessment and intervention are inherently complex, requiring clinician expertise and adequate resources. Globally, clinicians report reservations and limited confidence in AAC implementation, often due to insufficient training and a lack of structured tools. Similar challenges are evident in Turkey, where limited awareness and scarce clinical and academic resources contribute to hesitancy. To address this gap, this study introduced the Communication, Language, Speech and AAC Assessment Form and explored speech and language therapists’ (SLTs) perspectives on its utility. In Phase 1, the form was piloted with 26 individuals with CCN, aged 6–58, representing diverse diagnoses. In Phase 2, qualitative interviews were conducted with nine SLTs of varying AAC experience. Thematic analysis revealed that clinicians predominantly relied on informal observations for AAC assessment and expressed uncertainty about implementation. When introduced to the form, however, participants described it as inclusive, guiding, and supportive. Participants emphasised the potential of the form to facilitate accurate identification of needs, informed clinical decision-making, and supported appropriate referrals. They also noted its potential to strengthen family participation, highlight individual strengths, and enable dynamic assessment. Although its length posed a practical challenge, the form was valued for promoting comprehensive evaluation. Overall, findings suggest that culturally sensitive, structured assessment tools can enhance clinician confidence and contribute to more systematic AAC practices in Turkey.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Occupational Therapy
Occupational TherapyHealth Professions