PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Gait & Posture· 2014Q1

Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease

Brook Galna, Gill Barry, Dan Jackson, Dadirayi Mhiripiri et al.

Short summary

The Microsoft Kinect sensor accurately measures the timing of movements in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) (95% LOA <10% of group mean, ICCs >0.9) but shows varied success with spatial accuracy, excelling at gross movements like sit-to-stand (ICC=.989) but failing with fine movements like hand clasping (ICC=.012).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Kinect sensor shows high accuracy (ICCs >0.9, Pearson's r >0.9) in measuring movement timing for people with Parkinson's disease.
  • Spatial accuracy of the Kinect varies, with excellent performance for gross movements (e.g., sit-to-stand, ICC=.989).
  • Kinect's spatial accuracy is poor for fine movements like hand clasping (ICC=.012).
  • Most Kinect movement measurements strongly correlate with gold-standard Vicon system data (Pearson's r >0.8).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Microsoft Kinect sensor (Kinect) is potentially a low-cost solution for clinical and home-based assessment of movement symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of this study was to establish the accuracy of the Kinect in measuring clinically relevant movements in people with PD. METHODS: Nine people with PD and 10 controls performed a series of movements which were measured concurrently with a Vicon three-dimensional motion analysis system (gold-standard) and the Kinect. The movements included quiet standing, multidirectional reaching and stepping and walking on the spot, and the following items from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale: hand clasping, finger tapping, foot, leg agility, chair rising and hand pronation. Outcomes included mean timing and range of motion across movement repetitions. RESULTS: The Kinect measured timing of movement repetitions very accurately (low bias, 95% limits of agreement <10% of the group mean, ICCs >0.9 and Pearson's r>0.9). However, the Kinect had varied success measuring spatial characteristics, ranging from excellent for gross movements such as sit-to-stand (ICC=.989) to very poor for fine movement such as hand clasping (ICC=.012). Despite this, results from the Kinect related strongly to those obtained with the Vicon system (Pearson's r>0.8) for most movements. CONCLUSIONS: The Kinect can accurately measure timing and gross spatial characteristics of clinically relevant movements but not with the same spatial accuracy for smaller movements, such as hand clasping.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Gait & Posture, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationHealth Professions