Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology· 2026Q1
Performance and Safety of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Multicenter, Open-Label Trial
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A 15-day trial of a factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in 60 pregnant women (95% with GDM) showed high accuracy, with a 96.6% 20/20% agreement rate and a mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of 7.72%.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The CGM system achieved a 96.6% 20/20% agreement rate in pregnant women with GDM.
- The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 7.72% for left-arm sensors and 7.66% for right-arm sensors.
- The system was worn simultaneously on both upper arms for up to 15 days.
- 2901 matched CGM-reference pairs were analyzed.
- The CGM system was found to be accurate, stable, and safe for glucose monitoring in this population.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly important in pregnancies complicated by diabetes, where strict glycemic control is essential to prevent adverse outcomes such as fetal macrosomia and preterm birth. In gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-which accounts for most of the diabetes in pregnancy-maternal hyperglycemia is the primary clinical concern. This study evaluated the accuracy and safety of a factory-calibrated CGM system over 15 days in pregnant women with diabetes, with most having GDM. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, open-label trial enrolled 60 pregnant women (95% GDM, 3.3% type 1 diabetes, 1.7% type 2 diabetes). Each participant wore 2 sensors simultaneously, 1 on each upper arm, for up to 15 days. Venous blood glucose reference values were obtained using a Biosen C-line GP+ analyzer. Accuracy was assessed by 20/20% agreement rate, Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) error grid analysis, and mean absolute relative difference (MARD). Safety and usability were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2901 matched CGM-reference pairs were analyzed (1451 from left-arm sensors, 1450 from right-arm sensors). The 20/20% agreement rate was 96.6% (95% CI, 95.6%-97.5%) for the left arm and 96.8% (95% CI, 95.8%-97.7%) for the right arm. The overall MARD was 7.72% (95% CI, 7.33%-8.11%) for the left arm and 7.66% (95% CI, 7.27%-8.05%) for the right arm. CONCLUSION: The CGM system demonstrated accurate, stable, and safe glucose monitoring over 15 days in pregnant women with predominantly GDM. Its strong performance supports its utility as a reliable tool for glucose monitoring during pregnancy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Obstetrics and Gynecology
Obstetrics and GynecologyMedicine