Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship· 2026Q2· Review
How and to what extent does training transfer climate and training design shape transfer of training: evidence from a meta-analysis study
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A meta-analysis of 51 studies shows that both training design (e.g., transfer design, content validity) and training climate (e.g., peer, supervisory, and organizational support, opportunity to use, rewards) significantly enhance the transfer of learned skills to the job.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Training transfer climate, encompassing peer, supervisory, and organizational support, positively influences training transfer.
- Training design elements, including transfer design and perceived content validity, also positively impact the application of learned skills.
- Moderators like training type (hard vs. soft skills), culture, and gender explain variability in training transfer outcomes across studies.
- The meta-analysis synthesized data from 51 prior empirical studies on training transfer.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Purpose This study examines the relationship between training transfer climate and training design on transfer of training (TOT). It synthesizes findings from previous empirical studies using a meta-analytic framework. Additionally, subgroup moderation and meta-regression were performed to analyze the plausible reasons for equivocal findings across studies. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a meta-analysis technique to present the findings reported by 51 prior empirical studies on TOT, incorporating bivariate and moderation analyses. Findings The findings reveal that training transfer climate (peer support, supervisory support, organizational support, opportunity to use, and rewards) and training design (transfer design and perceived content validity) positively influence TOT. The study also examined the moderating effects of types of training (hard vs. soft skills), culture (high vs. low power distance and collectivism vs. individualism), and gender (male vs. female). The results show that these moderators explain inconsistent findings in the TOT literature. The study offers insightful recommendations for human resource development managers and practitioners to maximize the likelihood of TOT. Practical implications The study offers insightful recommendations for human resource development managers and practitioners to maximize the likelihood of TOT. Originality/value The study bears significant theoretical contributions by providing generalizable results and shedding light on equivocal findings in the TOT literature.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Applied Psychology
Applied PsychologyPsychology