PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin· 2026Q1

Contextual diagnostic framework for evaluating histopathology grey zones: a proposal with medicolegal implications using breast pathology as a model

Emad A Rakha, Abeer M. Shaaban, Mieke Van Bockstal, Thomas W. Decker et al.

Short summary

A new contextual diagnostic framework is proposed to evaluate histopathology diagnoses made in 'grey zones', shifting focus from a single optimal diagnosis to a range of reasonable interpretations based on the pathologist's context at the time of reporting.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Histopathology diagnoses, especially in 'grey zones', face medicolegal challenges due to interpretative nature and diagnostic variability.
  • A new framework integrates pathological, professional, and legal principles for evaluating diagnostic reasonableness.
  • The framework emphasizes reasonable competence, the diagnostic context at the time of reporting, and recognized diagnostic variability.
  • It shifts the focus from a single retrospectively optimal diagnosis to a range of diagnostically reasonable interpretations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract An acceptable standard of care in medical practice, including histopathology, is both a professional and legal requirement, yet its definition is increasingly challenged by rapid technological advances, including molecular testing, digital pathology and artificial intelligence, alongside evolving diagnostic thresholds. Although the interpretative nature of histopathology and its inherent diagnostic variability are well recognised, the implications of this variability for medicolegal assessment remain insufficiently conceptualised. Using breast pathology as a model, this review examines the medicolegal challenges of retrospective diagnostic assessment, in which subspecialist experts may be influenced by hindsight and knowledge of clinical outcomes, creating unrealistic expectations for the original reporting pathologist. We synthesise existing pathological, professional, and legal principles into a structured conceptual approach for evaluating the reasonableness of histopathological diagnoses. This approach integrates adherence to professional guidance with the “reasonable pathologist” peer standard and is informed by three key principles: reasonable competence within the relevant professional role, the diagnostic context at the time of reporting, and recognised diagnostic variability. Within this framework, we describe a conceptual contextual diagnostic standard that shifts the focus from identifying a single retrospectively optimal diagnosis to recognising a range of diagnostically reasonable interpretations supported by a responsible body of similarly competent practitioners working under comparable conditions. By aligning medicolegal assessment with the realities of contemporary pathology practice, this conceptual pathology-based framework may support more consistent expert opinion, facilitate defensible clinical decision-making, and provide a structured basis for evaluating histopathological performance.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Pharmacy

PharmacyHealth Professions