PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Nature Communications· 2025Q1

Systematic benchmarking of imaging spatial transcriptomics platforms in FFPE tissues

Huan Wang, Ruixu Huang, Jack Nelson, Ce Gao et al.

Short summary

10x Xenium platform shows higher transcript counts per gene in FFPE tissues compared to two other commercial imaging spatial transcriptomics platforms, without sacrificing specificity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 10x Xenium platform yields higher transcript counts per gene in FFPE tissues.
  • All three iST platforms analyzed show concordance with orthogonal RNA-seq.
  • Platforms differ in false discovery rates and cell segmentation error frequencies.
  • Spatially resolved cell typing is achievable across all platforms, with varying sub-clustering resolution.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Emerging imaging spatial transcriptomics (iST) platforms and coupled analytical methods can recover cell-to-cell interactions, groups of spatially covarying genes, and gene signatures associated with pathological features, and are thus particularly well-suited for applications in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues. Here, we benchmarked the performance of three commercial iST platforms on serial sections from tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 23 tumor and normal tissue types for both relative technical and biological performance. On matched genes, we found that 10x Xenium shows higher transcript counts per gene without sacrificing specificity, but that all three platforms concord to orthogonal RNA-seq datasets and can perform spatially resolved cell typing, albeit with different false discovery rates, cell segmentation error frequencies, and with varying degrees of sub-clustering for downstream biological analyses. Taken together, our analyses provide a comprehensive benchmark to guide the choice of iST method as researchers design studies with precious samples in this rapidly evolving field.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nature Communications, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Molecular Biology

Molecular BiologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology