PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology· 2026Q1

Optical imaging framework for melt pool monitoring and bead geometry prediction in blown powder directed energy deposition

William Huggins, Alan Burl, George Bourgikos, Christopher Saldaña et al.

Short summary

A new optical imaging framework uses analytical and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models to predict bead geometry in blown powder directed energy deposition (DED-LP), achieving 1.4% MAE for width and 3.7% MAE for height.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Developed an optical imaging framework for DED-LP melt pool monitoring and bead geometry prediction.
  • Analytical approach achieved 2.5% MAE for bead width and 16.2% MAE for height.
  • Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model improved prediction accuracy to 1.4% MAE for width and 3.7% MAE for height.
  • Framework validated for 316L stainless steel feedstock within a specific operating envelope.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Blown powder laser directed energy deposition (DED-LP) is an emerging additive manufacturing process with applications in both new part manufacture and repair of high-value components. However, the deposition of consistent bead geometry requires precise control of melt pool dynamics. While in-situ monitoring methods have been developed, linking melt pool optical signals to solidified geometry remains an open challenge. Monocular imaging offers a low-cost, minimally invasive sensing approach, yet is inherently indirect due to projection effects and process-induced optical variability. This work presents a monitoring framework to interpret melt pool images by analytical and data-driven means. Contours detected from intensity-based image segmentation are translated to world coordinates using affine projection to provide calibration-based geometric proxies for comparison with solidified bead geometry. At nominal printing conditions, the analytical approach yielded mean absolute percentage errors of 2.5 % for bead width and 16.2 % for bead height. The affine projection method captured trends in solidified bead geometry across the traverse speed and laser power ranges investigated within the material-specific operating envelope. To refine estimates, a Gaussian process regression model (GPR) was trained on image-derived features and process conditions. GPR achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 1.4 % for width and 3.7 % for height across the tested traverse speed conditions. This study demonstrates the applicability of analytical interpretations of monocular melt pool images for analysis within the standard operating window of 316L stainless steel feedstock and demonstrates how GPR may be leveraged to learn underlying relationships not captured by analytical intensity-based image segmentation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Mechanical Engineering

Mechanical EngineeringEngineering