Hereditas· 2026Q2
Identification and evaluation of diagnostic signatures for VTE based on bioinformatics analysis and machine learning
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A four-biomarker panel (BFAR, CXorf21, PIP5K1A, UBFD1) achieved an AUC of 0.979 in identifying VTE in a training dataset, with BFAR and CXorf21 showing significantly higher protein levels in VTE patients.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 76 common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in VTE patients, linked to erythrocyte homeostasis and oxidative stress.
- Four candidate diagnostic biomarkers (BFAR, CXorf21, PIP5K1A, UBFD1) were selected via machine learning.
- BFAR and CXorf21 protein levels were significantly higher in VTE patients than controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively).
- A four-biomarker model achieved an AUC of 0.979 in the training cohort and AUCs of 0.775 and 0.818 in independent validation cohorts.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common life-threatening vascular disorder for which reliable diagnostic biomarkers remain limited. This study aimed to identify potential diagnostic signatures by integrating bioinformatics and machine learning, followed by model evaluation. Methods Both GSE19151 and GSE48000 were adopted to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in VTE patients. Functional enrichment analyses were performed using GO and KEGG databases. Five machine learning algorithms (LASSO, RF, XGBoost, GBM, and KNN) were applied to screen diagnostic biomarkers. The expression levels and diagnostic performance of the candidate biomarkers were both evaluated in GSE19151, GSE48000 datasets and examined in a clinical cohort by ELISA. The models were evaluated using AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), and DeLong’s test was used to compare AUCs between models. Results Venn analysis identified 76 common DEGs in VTE, primarily enriched in erythrocyte homeostasis and oxidative stress pathways. Four candidate biomarkers (BFAR, CXorf21, PIP5K1A, and UBFD1) were identified. BFAR (535.7 ± 84.3 vs. 451.4 ± 24.2 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and CXorf21 (688.5 ± 89.8 vs. 598.8 ± 31.9 pg/mL, p = 0.006) protein levels were significantly higher in VTE patients than in controls. The GSE19151-derived four-molecule nomogram had an apparent AUC of 0.979 (95% CI: 0.962–0.997, p < 0.001) in the training cohort. Re-fitted four-biomarker models achieved AUCs of 0.775 (95% CI: 0.677–0.873, p < 0.001) in GSE48000 and 0.818 (95% CI: 0.701–0.935, p < 0.001) in the clinical cohort, respectively. DCA suggested a potential net benefit in the GSE19151, GSE48000 and clinical evaluation cohorts. Conclusion BFAR and CXorf21 are candidate VTE-associated biomarkers with directionally consistent transcriptomic and protein-level findings. The four-biomarker model remains exploratory and requires further validation.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Hereditas, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Internal Medicine
Internal MedicineMedicine