PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin· 2026Q1

Helpful and in Danger: Attributes and Correlates of Perceived Occupational Heroism

Jean Monéger, Roger Giner‐Sorolla

Short summary

Occupational heroism is associated with a 'moral shield' that decreases criticism acceptability and increases support for deregulation and protection from punishment, while also correlating with increased gratitude and perceived worker vulnerability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Occupational heroism is positively related to perceived helpfulness and risk exposure.
  • Heroic occupations benefit from a 'moral shield' reducing criticism acceptability.
  • Hero status increases support for deregulation and protection from punishment for rule-breaking.
  • Heroism correlates with increased gratitude, support for worker demands, and perceived worker vulnerability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Some occupations such as firefighters are described as heroic, while others, such as healthcare workers, are applauded as “heroes” in crises. In two preregistered correlational studies conducted on representative U.K. samples, we evaluated theory-based attributes of occupational heroism, and its relationship to specific policy-relevant attitudes toward occupations. In Study 1 ( N = 430), we confirmed that occupational heroism relates to the perceived helpfulness and risk exposure of workers. In Study 2 ( N = 840), we further showed that occupational heroism is associated with a moral shield: workers’ hero status correlates with decreased acceptability of criticism toward them, and increased support for deregulating them and protecting them from punishment for rule-breaking. Unlike previous findings suggesting a willingness to exploit heroized workers, heroism correlated with increased gratitude toward workers, support for their demands, and perception that they are vulnerable. Societal consequences and relevance for policy-making are discussed.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Social Psychology

Social PsychologyPsychology