Science and Medicine in Football· 2017Q1
A contemporary multi-modal mechanical approach to training monitoring in elite professional soccer
- 91citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
A 20-week study of 29 elite soccer players found significant differences in training load (TL) between training days and match days, and between different training session types, indicating that a multi-modal approach can effectively monitor targeted physical stressors.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Significant training load differences exist between training days and match days in elite soccer players.
- Both volume and intensity metrics of training load show significant differences across training sessions.
- No significant differences in session scores were found between the two days immediately preceding a match.
- A multi-modal approach combining mechanical volume and intensity is effective for monitoring targeted physical stressors.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Objectives: Understanding movements and mechanical demands of elite soccer players during training and competitive stressors is important for the support provision of player performance. Continued appreciation to quantify and monitor training load (TL) is apparent, however reporting multi-modal approaches in-line with competitive match-play demands remain limited. The investigation aimed to highlight a multimodal training monitoring method and its relationship to match-play.Subjects: 29 elite European soccer players participated were assessed (26.7 ± 4.07 years, height 183.4 ± 5.87 cm, body mass 78.4 ± 8.03 kg, 57.55 ± 5.32 ml.kg-1.min-1 and body composition 54.12 ± 13.65 mm) with daily TL and competitive match-load data in order to quantify the relationship between both.Methods: Key match-day (MD) data and TL was analysed across a 20-week in-season period.Results: Results reported significant TL differences between training days (TDs) and TDs and competitive MD data, in addition to significant differences between TDs for both volume- and intensity- session scores (p < 0.05). No differences were found between MD-1 and MD-2 session scores.Conclusion: To specific specific multi-modal approach used allows practitioners to combine key mechanical volume and intensity metrics as part of an athlete or player monitoring strategy and ensure a greater focus on targeted physical stressors.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Science and Medicine in Football, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports MedicineMedicine