Journal of Human Kinetics· 2022Q1
Influence of Tactical Behaviour on Running Performance in the Three Most Successful Soccer Teams During the Competitive Season of the Spanish First Division
- 19citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2022year
Short summary
Team 3's elaborate attacks and strong counter-attacks led to significantly higher high-speed running (>14, >21, >25 km/h) compared to Team 2, while Team 2 ran less at high speeds than Team 1.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Team 3 covered significantly more distance at high speeds (>14, >21, >25 km/h) than Team 2.
- Team 2 covered less distance at high speeds (>14 km/h) than Team 1.
- No significant differences in high-speed running were found between Team 1 and Team 3.
- Player position substantially influenced running activity, with midfielders generally covering greater distances and central defenders covering less.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of tactical behavior on physical performance of the three best Spanish soccer teams. Team 1 employed a 1-4-4-2 formation with compact defence and direct attacks, Team 2 employed an indirect style of play with a 1-4-3-3 formation and Team 3 used a 1-4-3-3 formation with elaborate attacks and strong counter-attacks. 816 individual situations of 54 professional soccer players categorized as fullbacks (FB), central defenders (CD), central midfielders (MF), wide midfielders (WM), and strikers (S) were included in the analysis. Their performance was examined with a player-tracking system. The analyzed variables included total distance covered, distance covered above 14, 21 and 24 km·h-1, as well as distance covered in possession of the ball and without possession of the ball. Team 2 covered a substantially lower distance >14 km·h–1 than Team 1 and substantially lower distances >14, >21, and >25km·h–1 than Team 3. No differences in running activity were found between Teams 1 and 3. However, there were substantial differences between the specific positions of the three teams. CD in Team 1 covered the lowest distance by a substantial margin in almost all variables analysed, whereas MF travelled substantially greater distances than did other positions. WM in Team 1 covered the greatest distance >18 and >21km·h– 1, while S in Team 2 had the lowest distance covered in almost all the variables, and FB in Team 3 showed the lowest total distance covered and distance covered >14km·h–1. WM in Team 2 had the greatest distance covered in possession, while S in Team 3 had the greatest distance covered out of possession. The results indicate that different team formations and associated tactical demands have a significant influence on running performance.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2022 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports MedicineMedicine