DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· 2021
بررسی فتوح قتیبه بن مسلم باهلی در ماوراءالنهر براساس اخبار بلاذری با روش ابنخلدون
- 0citations
- 2021year
Short summary
Al-Baladhuri's historical accounts of Qutayba ibn Muslim's conquests in Transoxiana lack sufficient accuracy and are open to criticism when evaluated by Ibn Khaldun's historiographical principles.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Al-Baladhuri's "Futūḥ al-buldān" is a key source for Islamic conquests.
- The study applies Ibn Khaldun's historiographical method to al-Baladhuri's work.
- Al-Baladhuri's narratives on Qutayba ibn Muslim's Transoxiana conquests are found to lack sufficient accuracy.
- The research concludes that al-Baladhuri's reports on this subject are open to criticism.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Ahmad ibn Yaḥya al-Balādhurī( 810 /820-892 AD) is one of the most influential historians, genealogist and great geographers of the Islamic world and the author of the book" Futūḥ al-buldān", which is considered one of the most important historical sources of conquest (Futūḥ) and a reference for many historians. He was the agent of "Diwan Kharaj" in the court of the Abbasid caliphs for a long time. Considering the importance and role of al-Balādhurī's reports in representing the conquest and victory (Futūḥ) of the Muslims, the purpose of this article is to examine and criticize his method in writing the history of the conquest using Ibn Khaldun's historiographical method and principles. Among his numerous news and reports, al-Balādhurī's narration about the conquest (Futūḥ) of of Transoxiana (Mawra al-Nahr) by Qutayba ibn Muslim al-Bahili has different dimensions.Therefore, the main question of this research is: What are the components of the historiography of al-Balādhurī about the conquest of Qutaiba bin Muslim in Transoxiana (Mawar al-Nahr) according to the criteria of Ibn Khaldun's methodical historiography? The historical investigations of the descriptive-analytical approach in the book "Futūḥ al-buldān " showed that the narratives of al-Balādhurī about the news of the Futuh do not have sufficient accuracy in recording the events and his reports about the conquest in the Transoxiana (Mawar al-Nahr) can be criticized
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), 2021 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences