PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Cotton Research· 2026Q2

Competitive interplay of cotton SELF PRUNING, FLOWERING LOCUS T, and FLOWERING LOCUS D proteins governing indeterminate flowering

Muhammad Zubair Ghouri, Sultan Habibullah Khan, Zunaira Afzal Naveed, Iqrar Ahmad Rana et al.

Short summary

Cotton's flowering regulators SELF PRUNING (SP), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), and FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD) compete for binding sites on FD, with SP and FT showing strong, similar binding affinities to FD's GLU-242 residue, while FT-SP interactions are weaker.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • SP and FT competitively bind to the GLU-242 residue on FD, forming stable complexes (Complex I and II).
  • FD-mediated complexes (FD-SP and FT-FD) exhibit strong binding affinities (ΔG = –14.1 kcal·mol⁻¹, KD = 4.5 × 10⁻¹¹ M) and structural stability.
  • Direct FT-SP interactions (Complex III) are weaker (ΔG = –10.9 kcal·mol⁻¹, KD = 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ M) and structurally less stable.
  • Molecular dynamics simulations confirm the stability of FD-mediated complexes with low RMSDs (0.04 nm).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Indeterminate cotton is capable of prolonged vegetative growth and increased fruiting; however, excessive plant height is often associated with fruit abscission, uneven nutrient supply, and difficulties in mechanized harvesting. Therefore, developing early-maturing, machine-harvestable cotton varieties with compact growth remains a long-standing objective for breeders. Members of the phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP) gene family play central roles in maintaining indeterminate growth in cotton. Results In this study, molecular docking coupled with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations was employed to characterize protein–protein interactions among PEBP family members FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), SELF PRUNING (SP), and the bZIP transcription factor FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD) in Gossypium hirsutum . Docking analysis of Complex I (FD-SP) revealed a strong hydrogen bond (H-bond) and salt bridge between the GLU-242 residue of FD and the ARG-102 residue of SP, whereas in Complex II (FT-FD), the same FD residue (GLU-242) formed an H-bond and a salt bridge with the ARG-111 residue of FT, indicating that SP and FT compete for GLU-242 at FD’s interface. Complex III (FT-SP) displayed comparatively weaker interactions between FT GLU-166 and SP’s LYS-50 through hydrogen bonding and salt bridge formation, suggesting a less favorable interaction. Binding free energy (Δ G ) = –14.1 kcal·mol⁻ 1 and dissociation constant ( K D ) = 4.5 × 10 –11 M, represented consistent values for Complex I and Complex II, while Complex III indicated substantially weaker binding interactions with Δ G = –10.9 kcal·mol⁻ 1 and a K D score of 1.0 × 10 –8 M. Furthermore, MD simulations of the docked complexes (I and II) revealed a stable hydrogen-bonding network, low root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of 0.04 nm, and H-bond distances within 0.3 nm throughout the simulation period. In contrast, Complex III exhibited a reduced H-bond network and a late-stage RMSD spike, indicating structural instability compared to the stronger FD-mediated Complexes I and II. Conclusions These findings provide a structural framework for understanding the competitive interplay among PEBP family members, highlighting potential candidates for future functional validation and the development of improved cotton ideotypes.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Cotton Research, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Plant Science

Plant ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences