PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Citizen Science Theory and Practice· 2026Q1

Participant Learning and Open Archives Through Artificial Intelligence and Citizen Humanities

Dick Kasperowski, Karl-Magnus Johansson

Short summary

Citizen volunteers in the 'The Detective Section' project learned and developed expertise by transcribing historical documents using AI-powered Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR), leading to more accurate transcriptions and democratizing archive access.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • AI-powered Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) can make historical documents searchable.
  • Citizen volunteers in 'The Detective Section' project built and refined an HTR training dataset.
  • Participants experienced multifaceted learning, developing expertise and becoming 'epistemic subjects'.
  • Emotional investment in local history led to extra transcription work and improved accuracy.
  • Refined participatory practices can enhance volunteer learning and archive accessibility.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Online archives host millions of scanned historical documents. However, images of old handwriting remain unsearchable and largely inaccessible without transcription. These limitations can now be mitigated by advances in Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR), which uses machine learning to convert images of handwriting into text data. In the HTR and Citizen Humanities project The Detective Section, the Swedish National Archives invited volunteers to build and refine a large, high-quality training dataset for an HTR application. This qualitative interview study explores how participants in The Detective Section perceived their involvement in the project in terms of learning and knowledge development. By applying a typology for understanding multifaceted learning and drawing on conceptual resources from science and technology studies (STS), the study highlights how participants perceived themselves as developing into epistemic subjects within an epistemic culture. We found that participants learn both individually and collectively, often in unexpected ways, through and beyond predefined goals and protocols. Their strong emotional investment and interest in local history leads to additional activities, which in turn result in more accurate transcriptions. We conclude by discussing refinements to participatory practices within the GLAM sector that can support volunteer learning and help democratize access to archival collections.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Citizen Science Theory and Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Conservation

ConservationArts and Humanities