PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Neurosurgical FOCUS· 2026Q1

Advancing neurosurgical practice with augmented reality: a single-center real-world case series with illustrated technical notes

Jiahe Guo, Haowei Li, Zhiyan Kou, Zhang Peihai et al.

Short summary

A head-mounted augmented reality (AR) navigation platform was feasible and valuable across 105 diverse neurosurgical procedures, enabling gross-total resection in 62/69 cranial tumor cases and Grade A pedicle screw placement in all 34 spine cases.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Augmented reality navigation was applied to 105 neurosurgical procedures, including cranial tumor, spine, cerebrovascular, and functional surgeries.
  • Gross-total resection was achieved in 62 of 69 cranial tumor surgeries using AR-supported multimodal planning.
  • All 34 pedicle screws placed with AR-guided spine navigation achieved an excellent Gertzbein-Robbins grade of A.
  • The platform's value is linked to case selection, registration reliability, and workflow, with conventional methods necessary when AR accuracy or ergonomics are insufficient.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world application and clinical value of a head-mounted augmented reality (AR) navigation platform across a wide range of neurosurgical pathologies and procedures. METHODS In this real-world retrospective case series, the authors assessed 105 neurosurgical procedures performed by 8 neurosurgeons at a single center from January 2024 to March 2026. A head-mounted AR navigation platform (SurgicalAR, Cranial Navigation, and Spine Navigation; Medivis) was used in all procedures. Video records were available for all cases. Clinical and pathological data, surgical approaches, types of reference frames, and registration methods were systematically collected. The workflow for each surgical approach was characterized in detail. RESULTS This analysis included 105 cases (60 female, mean age 53.5). Cranial surgeries (n = 92, 87.6%) were most common, predominantly for tumors (n = 69, 65.7%), with meningioma (22.9%) and glioblastoma (19.0%) as the leading pathologies. Custom reference frames (n = 57) and surface registration (n = 93) were the most frequently used techniques in cranial navigation. In cranial tumor surgery, gross-total resection was achieved in 62 of 69 cases, supported by multimodal AR planning. In spine surgery, all 34 pedicle screws placed with the Spine Navigation system achieved a Gertzbein-Robbins grade of A. AR was also successfully applied to cerebrovascular, puncture-based, and functional surgery. CONCLUSIONS Head-mounted AR navigation was feasible across diverse procedures, but its value depended on case selection, registration reliability, and workflow. It was most useful for multimodal tumor planning, pedicle screw placement, and percutaneous interventions; conventional navigation or direct anatomical guidance remained necessary when AR accuracy or ergonomics were inadequate. These findings support AR as a significant advancement in future neurosurgical practice.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Neurosurgical FOCUS, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Computer Vision and Pattern RecognitionComputer Science