PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of The Electrochemical Society· 2026Q1

Free Ionomer Controls Adsorption in Electrolyzer Inks

Maximilian Degirmenci, Siddharth Rajupet, Diego Soestrino, Sunilkumar Khandavalli et al.

Short summary

Free ionomer concentration, not catalyst loading or I:C ratio, dictates ionomer adsorption onto catalyst particles in electrolyzer inks, with solvent composition determining the dominant adsorption mechanism (electrostatics vs. solvation).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Ionomer adsorption onto IrOx catalyst particles in electrolyzer inks is independent of IrOx concentration.
  • Free ionomer concentration and solvent composition are the key determinants of ionomer adsorption.
  • Free-ionomer weight percentage is a more meaningful metric than the I:C ratio for predicting adsorption.
  • Adsorption mechanisms differ: electrostatic repulsion dominates in water-rich solvents, while solvation forces prevail in alcohol-rich solvents.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The ionomer/catalyst interface in proton-exchange-membrane water-electrolyzer (PEMWE) anode catalyst layers governs multi-species transport and reaction kinetics, and originates from ionomer adsorption onto catalyst particles during ink formation. These inks contain iridium oxide (IrOx) catalyst and PEM ionomer (typically perfluorosulfonic acid, PFSA) dispersed in water:alcohol solvent mixtures, deposited to form the catalyst layer upon solvent evaporation. Despite the importance of ink formulation controlling ionomer adsorption, a systematic investigation spanning industrially relevant formulations (including concentrated inks used in roll-to-roll manufacturing) is missing. Here, we investigate the influence of IrOx concentration, ionomer-to-catalyst (I:C) ratio, and solvent composition on PFSA adsorption using thermal gravimetric analysis. PFSA adsorption is independent of IrOx concentration, being instead determined by free-ionomer concentration and solvent identity, across both dilute and concentrated inks. We further show that I:C ratio is a poor descriptor, with free-ionomer weight percentage providing a more meaningful metric that collapses adsorption data onto a single isotherm. In water-rich solvents, adsorption is primarily limited by electrostatic repulsion, whereas, in alcohol-rich solvents, solvation forces and surface-coverage effects dominate. We additionally characterize ink stability (sedimentation, x-ray scattering) and single-cell performance. These results extend to PFSA-based catalyst inks (including high-surface-area carbons), offering practical implications for ink formulation across deposition methods.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Electrical and Electronic EngineeringEngineering