PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PLoS ONE· 2026Q1

Identifying knowledge gaps in a biodiversity database and their spatial determinants

Anaïs Guéry, Didier Alard

Short summary

Knowledge gaps in a French regional biodiversity database are primarily driven by site accessibility, not ecological factors, with insects showing greater gaps than vertebrates.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Insects have higher knowledge gaps than vertebrates in the analyzed French regional biodiversity database.
  • Site accessibility, not ecological appeal, is the primary determinant of knowledge gaps across most taxonomic groups.
  • Agricultural pressure significantly impacts knowledge gaps more for insects than for vertebrates.
  • Biodiversity governance, local funding, and political decisions shape knowledge distribution in the database.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Open-access biodiversity databases are valuable resources in the structuring and accessibility of species occurrence data. By compiling different data sources, they reveal the uneven spatial distribution of knowledge, with certain areas and taxonomic groups being better represented. Understanding the determinants of spatial and taxonomic knowledge gaps helps in informing the use of open-access data. Here, we identified determinants of knowledge gaps within a French regional biodiversity database, in the largest administrative region in France. Knowledge gaps were assessed using two metrics, completeness and ignorance scores, for 8 taxonomic groups covering five vertebrate and three insect groups. The data were analyzed for the entire region, but also at the level of the three former sub-regions, to identify the potential drivers that may account for knowledge gaps’ determinants locally. Our findings show that insects were characterized by higher knowledge gaps than vertebrates. Overall, knowledge gaps are influenced by variables related to sites’ accessibility rather than ecological appeal across both metrics. All groups shared similar determinants of gaps, except for the impact of agricultural pressure which is found to be more significant for insects than vertebrates. Ultimately, our study emphasizes the impact of biodiversity governance, through local funding and regional political decisions, on knowledge distribution in open-access databases. We recommend limiting these biases by redirecting biodiversity funding towards under-sampled taxonomic groups and under-prospected areas. When not possible, users of data extracted from these databases should correct for spatial-sampling biases (SSP) using maps of knowledge gaps in order to get a more accurate understanding of species occurrence.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Ecological ModelingEnvironmental Science