PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Environmental Technology Reviews· 2026Q1

Comparative analysis of AI models for solid waste forecasting

Anass Hamraoui, Hamid Ech-Cheikh, Abdessamad Douraid, Ahmed Loukili et al.

Short summary

Hybrid and ensemble AI models outperform individual approaches like SVMs and NARX in solid waste forecasting, with XGBoost and chaotic frameworks showing improved efficiency and stability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Hybrid and ensemble AI models show superior accuracy, robustness, and generalizability for solid waste forecasting.
  • XGBoost and chaotic frameworks offer improved computational efficiency and predictive stability compared to traditional black-box models.
  • No single AI model is universally optimal; selection criteria include dataset quality, forecasting horizon, and specific objectives.
  • Hybrid architectures integrating preprocessing, optimization, and ensemble learning are recommended for reliable and interpretable forecasts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The accurate prediction of solid waste (SW) generation is a critical component of sustainable waste management, particularly in the face of increasing environmental and socio-economic pressures. Traditional approaches such as surveys, time series analyses, and regression techniques often struggle to capture nonlinear patterns and adapt to changing conditions. This study provides a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models applied to diverse waste generation streams. Models examined include hybrid and ensemble frameworks, as well as individual approaches such as SVMs, NARX, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), grey relational analysis-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (GRA-BiLSTM), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and Inclusive Multiple Model (IMM). Unlike previous reviews, we explicitly bridge the gap between algorithmic precision and real-world decision-making, while addressing the unique data-reproducibility challenges found in developing-country contexts. Hybrid and ensemble models consistently achieve superior accuracy, robustness, and generalizability. XGBoost and chaotic frameworks also demonstrate improved computational efficiency and predictive stability compared to traditional black-box models. Importantly, no single model is universally optimal; selection should consider dataset quality, forecasting horizon, and specific application objectives. Hybrid architectures integrating preprocessing, optimisation, and ensemble learning offer the most reliable tools for high-performing and interpretable forecasts. These insights guide researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in developing advanced waste forecasting systems to support informed decision-making and sustainable waste management planning.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Environmental Technology Reviews, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Waste Management and DisposalEnvironmental Science