PofoliaShared via Pofolia

eLife· 2026Q1

Ultrasound neuromodulation hypotheses on the directionality of effects and community resource

Hugo Caffaratti, Ben Slater, Nour Shaheen, Ariane E. Rhone et al.

Short summary

Low-intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) may bias neural function enhancement or suppression, with intensity and duty cycle showing statistical trends in a meta-analysis of 47 human studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Hypotheses are collated for using TUS to bias toward neural enhancement or suppression.
  • A meta-analysis of 47 human studies identified potential trends for intensity and duty cycle to influence TUS directionality.
  • The inTUS database is established for systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes.
  • A review of human clinical TUS studies illustrates how directionality hypotheses can be tested.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Low-intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation is a promising non-invasive technique for brain stimulation and focal neuromodulation. Research with humans and animal models has raised the possibility that TUS can be biased towards enhancing or suppressing neural function. Here, we first collate a set of hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects and conduct an initial meta-analysis on available healthy human participant TUS studies reporting stimulation parameters and outcomes ( n = 47 studies, 52 experiments). In initial exploratory analyses with univariate tests, we find that parameters such as the intensity and continuity of stimulation (duty cycle) show statistical trends towards likely TUS neural enhancement or suppression of function. Machine-learning analyses were limited by the currently small sample size. Given that human TUS sample sizes are expected to increase, predictability on the directionality of TUS effects could improve if a database is available. Therefore, we establish an inTUS database and resource for the systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes to assist in greater precision in TUS use for brain stimulation and neuromodulation. The paper concludes with a selective review of human clinical TUS studies illustrating how hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects could be developed for empirical testing in the intended clinical application, not limited to the examples provided. Highlights Collated set of hypotheses on using TUS to bias towards neural enhancement or suppression Meta-analysis results identify parameters that may bias directionality of TUS effects inTUS resource established for systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes Selective review of patient TUS studies for enhancing or suppressing neural function

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. eLife, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Biomedical Engineering

Biomedical EngineeringEngineering