Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction· 2026Q1
Routing-Aware Explanations for Mixture of Experts Graph Models in Malware Detection
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new routing-aware explainable Mixture of Experts (MoE) framework for malware detection using control flow graphs improves accuracy by 4.82 percentage points (93.49% vs. 88.67% baseline) and provides faithful explanations aligned with expert contributions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces a routing-aware explainable MoE framework for malware detection using control flow graphs.
- Combines node-level diversity (degree reweighting, complementary pooling) and graph-level diversity (six experts, Top-k routing).
- Achieves 93.49% accuracy, a 4.82 percentage-point improvement over the GMoE baseline (88.67%).
- Routing-aware aggregation provides faithful explanations aligned with model predictions across sparsity levels.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Mixture of Experts offers flexible graph reasoning by combining multiple views of a graph through a learned router. However, existing Graph-MoE approaches do not explicitly account for input-dependent expert routing when generating post-hoc explanations. To address this limitation, we propose a routing-aware explainable MoE framework for malware detection using control flow graphs. The framework introduces diversity at two levels. At the node level, multiple neighborhood statistics are combined using degree reweighting and complementary pooling functions. At the graph level, six experts, each associated with a specific structural and statistical view, produce graph-level predictions that are combined through Top-k routing with load balancing. A routing-aware post-hoc explanation mechanism generates expert-specific edge attributions and aggregates them according to the learned routing weights, thereby aligning the explanation with the experts that contribute to each prediction. Experimental results show that the complete Top-2 MoE achieves an accuracy of 93.49%, compared with 88.67% for the GMoE baseline, corresponding to a 4.82 percentage-point improvement. Perturbation-based evaluation further shows that routing-aware aggregation provides faithful explanations with respect to the model’s predictions across different sparsity levels.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Signal Processing
Signal ProcessingComputer Science