Isidorianum· 2026Q2
Persecution and Christian Mobility before Constantine: Forced Movement, Networks, and Communication
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Christian persecution before Constantine generated forced mobility (flight, exile, labor) and secondary movements (visits, correspondence), which paradoxically helped maintain or establish networks around refugees and prisoners, and connected Christians with authorities and local populations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Christian persecution before Constantine led to forced movements such as flight, arrest, exile, and forced labor.
- Secondary movements included companions, prisoner visits, correspondence, and spectators.
- Persecution-generated mobility helped maintain or establish networks around refugees and prisoners.
- Christians were brought into contact with guards, magistrates, and local communities through these movements.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article explores a spectrum of mobility generated by the persecution of Christians before Constantine. Some of this mobility was forced and involved flight, arrest, transfer for trial, exile, forced labour in the mines or movement toward execution. Other movement was secondary, including companions travelling with the persecuted, visits to prisoners, letters and provisions being carried and spectators gathering. While persecution was surely disruptive for communities, families and individuals, the study shows that some of the mobility it generated resulted in networks and contacts being maintained or established around refugees, exiles and prisoners, while Christians were also brought into contact with guards, magistrates and local communities. This pattern is found through analysis of selected sources of different genres, by diverse authors, and from different geographical and historical contexts, rather than through an exhaustive examination of a single genre, corpus or author. The recurrence of similar patterns across such diverse sources shows that the evidence is not unique or anecdotal.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Isidorianum, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Anthropology
AnthropologySocial Sciences