Frontiers in Medicine· 2026Q1
Emergency management of doctor–patient group incidents in a regional general hospital based on the 4R crisis management theory
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A 4R crisis management framework (Reduction, Readiness, Response, Recovery) was applied to 10 doctor-patient group incidents following patient death in a regional hospital, revealing common collective behaviors like body retention (9/10) and banner displays (7/10).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 10 doctor-patient group incidents following patient death were analyzed using the 4R crisis management framework.
- Incidents frequently involved collective behaviors such as body retention (9/10) and banner displays (7/10).
- The 4R framework provided a stage-based description of risk communication, preparedness, response, and follow-up.
- A proposed organizational framework for future process review was developed.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Growing clinical complexity and healthcare demand can intensify medical disputes, and patient deaths or severe complications may be followed by collective disruptive events. This single-center retrospective descriptive case series used the 4R crisis management framework (Reduction, Readiness, Response, and Recovery) to organize the review of 10 doctor–patient group incidents documented in a regional general hospital from 2013 to 2023. We summarized incident characteristics, departments, collective behaviors, handling pathways, record-coded contributing factors, and documented hospital activities, and mapped each incident to the four 4R stages using predefined coding rules. All included incidents followed a patient death. Four incidents occurred in pediatrics or neonatology, and two occurred in cardiothoracic surgery. Frequently documented collective behaviors included ward or body retention (9/10), banners or memorial displays (7/10), obstruction of clinicians or offices (5/10), and online dissemination (2/10). The 4R mapping provided a stage-based description of recorded risk communication, preparedness, on-site response, and post-incident follow-up activities. It also supported the development of a proposed organizational framework for future process review. Because the study had no comparison group or standardized response and recovery outcomes, the findings do not establish the effectiveness or causal effects of any management measure.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pharmacy
PharmacyHealth Professions