PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Energy Policy· 2026Q1

Towards European hydrogen market design: Perspectives from transmission system operators

Marco Saretta, Enrica Raheli, Jalal Kazempour

Short summary

European gas TSOs believe core hydrogen market design principles (entry-exit systems, virtual trading points) are transferable from natural gas markets, but capacity allocation, tariffs, and balancing regimes need specific adaptations for hydrogen.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Core market design principles (entry-exit, virtual trading points) are transferable from natural gas markets to hydrogen.
  • Capacity allocation needs targeted adaptation for better coupling with electricity markets.
  • Tariffs require intertemporal cost allocation to shield early hydrogen market adopters.
  • Balancing regimes must be revised to accommodate hydrogen's physical characteristics and linepack flexibility.
  • Key challenges include supply/demand mismatches, limited storage, fragmented clusters, and regulatory uncertainty.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Despite hydrogen being central to Europe's decarbonisation strategy, only a small share of renewable hydrogen projects reached final investment decision. A key barrier is uncertainty about how future hydrogen markets will be designed and operated, particularly under Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin requirements. This study investigates the extent to which future hydrogen market design can be adapted from existing natural gas markets, and the challenges it must address. The analysis was based on a survey on future hydrogen market design targeting European gas transmission system operators, the stakeholder group responsible for operating the network and implementing the Network Codes. The survey provided an assessment of mechanism transferability and identified challenges for the early development of the hydrogen market. Core market design principles and trading frameworks are broadly transferable from natural gas markets, as entry-exit systems and virtual trading points. Capacity allocation requires targeted adaptation to improve coupling with electricity markets. Tariffs require adaptation through intertemporal cost allocation, distributing infrastructure costs over time to protect early adopters. Balancing regimes should be revisited to reflect hydrogen's physical characteristics and different linepack flexibility usages. Key challenges for early hydrogen markets include: temporal mismatches between variable renewable supply and expected relatively stable industrial demand, limited operational flexibility due to scarce storage and reduced pipeline linepack, fragmented regional hydrogen clusters, and regulatory uncertainty affecting long-term investment decisions. These findings provide empirical input to the hydrogen Network Codes and offer guidance to policymakers designing hydrogen market frameworks.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Energy Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Energy Engineering and Power TechnologyEnergy