Catalysts· 2026Q2· Review
Iron-Based Catalysts for Direct CO2 Hydrogenation to Hydrocarbons: A Systematic Review and Descriptive Quantitative Synthesis of Conversion, Selectivity and Stability (2017–2026)
- 1citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A quantitative synthesis of 42 studies (2017-2026) shows median CO2 conversion of 38.3% for iron-based catalysts in direct CO2 hydrogenation to hydrocarbons, with product-water inhibition limiting single-stage conversion.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Median CO2 conversion for iron-based catalysts in CO2-FTS is 38.3% (n=42 studies, 2017-2026).
- Product-water inhibition significantly limits single-stage conversion; two-stage reactor engineering achieved 69.9% conversion.
- Highest selectivities reported: 64.3% to C5+ (Na-FeMgMnOx), 82.6% to light olefins (Y2O3/Fe–Co/SAPO-34), 75.6% to aromatics (ZnFeOx-Na/HZSM-5).
- Maximum demonstrated stability was 205 h (3K/6Cu-Fe2O3/C nanosheets).
- 60-85% of primary reports lack key physicochemical descriptors (e.g., BET surface area, Mössbauer phase composition).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Iron-based catalysts for direct CO2 hydrogenation to hydrocarbons (CO2-FTS) have attracted rapidly growing research interest as a Power-to-X route, yet we did not identify a prior systematic review with descriptive quantitative synthesis focused specifically on this catalyst class. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this work provides a systematic descriptive quantitative synthesis, covering 60 coded reports published between January 2017 and July 2026 and identified by structured searches of Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ScienceDirect. After PRISMA-adapted eligibility reconciliation, 49 primary studies were included; 42 reported extractable numerical CO2 conversion data and contributed to the descriptive quantitative synthesis, while seven were retained for qualitative analysis only. Median CO2 conversion across the 42 quantitative studies was 38.3% (range 8.5–69.9%; SD = 15.3%), providing a dataset-specific reference for the reviewed literature. Across the predefined subgroups, mean CO2 conversion varied from 31.6% to 47.1%, with substantial differences in operating conditions and small subgroup sizes limiting direct attribution to catalyst composition. The highest absolute conversion, 69.9%, was achieved by two-stage reactor engineering with interstage H2O removal, not catalyst reformulation, identifying product-water inhibition as an important single-stage conversion constraint. The highest recorded product selectivities across the dataset were 64.3% to C5+ (Na-FeMgMnOx), 82.6% to light olefins (Y2O3/Fe–Co/SAPO-34), and 75.6% to aromatics (ZnFeOx-Na/HZSM-5); maximum demonstrated stability was 205 h (3K/6Cu-Fe2O3/C nanosheets). Analysis of the full conversion–selectivity dataset reveals that only approximately 14% of studied systems simultaneously exceeded the conversion median and a 44% target-selectivity threshold. The synthesis further identifies that key physicochemical descriptors (BET surface area, post-reaction Mössbauer phase composition, CO2-TPD basicity, ASF α, space-time yield normalised to iron mass, and stability data) are absent from 60–85% of primary reports, and proposes recommended reporting elements to facilitate future quantitative synthesis. Because study-level variances and standardised controls were unavailable, no weighted effect-size meta-analysis was performed; the results should be interpreted as a descriptive quantitative synthesis. The review was not prospectively registered.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Catalysts, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Catalysis
CatalysisChemical Engineering