Hydrology and earth system sciences· 2026Q1
Basin-scale evaluation of the Noah-MP land surface model for runoff and snow generation in the Missouri River Basin: insights and recommendations for parameterization scheme selection
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Alternative parameterization schemes in the Noah-MP land surface model significantly improved runoff and snowmelt simulations across the Missouri River Basin, with the INF scheme showing the largest KGE improvement of 0.48.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Alternative Noah-MP parameterization schemes (RUN, SFC, INF, STC) generally improved runoff simulations compared to the default scheme.
- The INF scheme yielded the largest improvement in Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) for runoff, increasing it by 0.48 in representative subbasins.
- The STC scheme improved the representation of snowmelt-driven runoff, reducing the bias in the April-July runoff-to-maximum SWE ratio by 12-32% in high-elevation areas.
- Model performance was evaluated using USGS streamflow and University of Arizona SWE data from 2014-2023 across 50 Hydro-Climate Data Networks.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract. Process-based land surface models, such as the Noah-Multiparameterization (Noah-MP) model, are widelyused for large-scale hydrologic simulations because of their flexibility in selecting multiple parameterization schemes. However, limited guidance on choosing appropriate configurations constrains their reliability in representing runoff and snowmelt dynamics across diverse land-cover and snow conditions. This study evaluates the defaultparameterization scheme and four alternative parameterization schemes in the Noah-MP land surface model, includingRunoff and Groundwater (RUN), Surface Exchange Coefficient for Heat (SFC), Frozen Soil Permeability (INF), and Snow/Soil Temperature Time Scheme (STC), across 50 Hydro-Climate Data Networks (HCDNs) in the MissouriRiver Basin. Model performance was evaluated using USGS streamflow observations and snow water equivalent (SWE) estimates from the University of Arizona dataset for 2014 to 2023. Results showed that the alternative schemes generally improved runoff simulation compared to the default scheme through better representing key hydrologicaland thermodynamic processes. Specifically, the RUN, SFC, INF, and STC experiments improved the Kling–GuptaEfficiency (KGE) by 0.19, 0.37, 0.48, and 0.14, respectively in representative subbasins, through enhancedgroundwater dynamics, reduced evapotranspiration bias, improved rapid runoff response, and more accurate SWE evolution. SWE evaluation further indicates that the STC experiment reduced the mean bias of the April–July runoff- to-maximum SWE ratio by 12–32 % in high-elevation subbasins, reflecting improved representation of snowmeltdriven runoff. These results highlight the importance of basin-specific parameterization schemes within Noah-MP toimprove hydrological prediction and water management across diverse hydroclimatic regions. The findings further indicate optimal parameterization schemes for different climates, land cover, and snow regimes.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Hydrology and earth system sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Water Science and TechnologyEnvironmental Science