PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Applied Sciences· 2026Q2

STLC Manager: Benchmarking LLM-Driven Model-to-Test Transformation and Test Case Optimization

Cem Bağlum, Uğur Yayan, Ahmet Taylan Yazıcı

Short summary

STLC Manager, an LLM-supported framework, transforms diverse artifacts (requirements, UML/XML, code) into structured test scenarios and cases, optimizing redundancy reduction via Serial, Bulk, and Parallel strategies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • STLC Manager transforms heterogeneous software artifacts into structured test scenarios and cases using LLMs.
  • It offers Serial, Bulk, and Parallel strategies for semantic redundancy reduction in test generation.
  • Controlled study results show mean Test Redundancy Ratios from 0.0063 to 0.5000 (Bulk) and 0.1250 to 0.6375 (Parallel).
  • Item-level modal agreement was high for Bulk (98.44%-100%) but varied for Parallel (75.31%-97.19%).
  • Artifact-scoped Scenario Coverage Preservation ranged from 0.900 to 1.000.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate software tests from heterogeneous artifacts, but semantic redundancy and stochastic output variability complicate reliable pre-execution refinement. This paper presents STLC Manager, an LLM-supported framework that transforms requirements, UML/XML models, and source code into structured test scenarios and test cases and supports Serial, Bulk, and Parallel strategies for semantic redundancy reduction. Validation combines archived cross-model evidence with a controlled local study of 60 runs over two fixed 64-case suites, three installed models, partitioned local Bulk and Controlled Local Parallel, and five repetitions per configuration. The evaluation also reconstructs a three-rater human consensus and includes a deterministic TF–IDF reference. In the controlled study, mean Test Redundancy Ratio ranged from 0.0063 to 0.5000 for partitioned Bulk and from 0.1250 to 0.6375 for Parallel. Item-level modal agreement ranged from 98.44% to 100% for Bulk and from 75.31% to 97.19% for Parallel, while mean artifact-scoped Scenario Coverage Preservation ranged from 0.900 to 1.000. The results show greater configuration sensitivity for Parallel under the evaluated protocol. However, the workloads differ and do not support a causal ranking of the strategies. The implementation is publicly available. The conclusions are limited to pre-execution semantic refinement and do not establish executability, coverage, mutation adequacy, or fault detection.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Software

SoftwareComputer Science