PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics· 2026Q1· Review

Advancing Evidence Generation in Small, Diverse, Understudied Population

Amitava Mitra, Anne‐Gaëlle Dosne, Douglas Steinbach, Hannah M. Jones et al.

Short summary

Integrating model-informed drug development, real-world data, external controls, and patient-centric designs can generate sufficient evidence for drug approval in underrepresented populations, potentially replacing traditional clinical trial data in some cases.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Clinically important patient groups are systematically underrepresented in drug development due to trial exclusions.
  • A lack of direct evidence for these groups leads to uncertain benefit-risk and dosing decisions.
  • Integrating model-informed drug development, real-world data, external controls, and patient-centric designs can create a totality-of-evidence package.
  • These integrated tools can, in defined settings, partially replace traditional clinical data.
  • Specific approaches include mechanistic modeling for organ dysfunction/maternal-fetal physiology, registry-based controls for rare diseases, and decentralized designs for underserved communities.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Many clinically important patient groups remain systematically underrepresented in drug development. Among these are patients with severe or time‐varying organ dysfunction, pregnant and lactating women, children with ultrarare diseases, and people from socioeconomically or geographically underserved communities. Traditional clinical trials frequently exclude such groups. Little direct evidence is generated as a result, leaving benefit–risk and dosing decisions uncertain and trial findings poorly generalizable to the patients who will ultimately receive the drug. No single method closes this gap. This review argues that progress instead comes from integration, combining model‐informed drug development, registries and real‐world data, external and virtual controls, Bayesian borrowing, and patient‐centric trial designs into a coherent totality‐of‐evidence package. These tools are maturing from a role that supplements clinical data toward one that can, in defined settings, partially replace it. The appropriate approach may differ by population. For example, (1) mechanistic modeling and exposure prediction for organ replacement therapy/changing organ function or from the altered maternal–fetal–infant physiology that makes prospective studies impractical; (2) registry‐based external controls and natural history data where patients are too few to randomize; and (3) decentralized, partnership‐driven designs to reach populations that structural barriers would otherwise exclude. Three case studies (dose justification across hepatic and renal impairment, evidence generation in women of childbearing potential with chronic autoimmune disease, and a registry‐anchored ultrarare pediatric program) illustrated these approaches. Mapped to evolving regulatory frameworks, these strategies can deliver population‐appropriate dosing at approval rather than through postmarketing commitments, accelerating equitable access to safe and effective therapies.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Statistics and Probability

Statistics and ProbabilityMathematics