PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Bone & Joint Journal· 2026Q1

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants with low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty

Hasan Raza Mohammad, Azmi Rahman, Ibrahim M. Muhammad, Saran Singh Gill et al.

Short summary

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) significantly reduce venous thromboembolism (VTE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk after total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), with no increased bleeding risk when using UK-licensed agents and doses.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • DOACs reduced VTE risk by 38% (OR 0.62) and DVT risk by 40% (OR 0.60) compared to LMWH after THA.
  • No significant difference in bleeding risk was observed between DOACs and LMWH when using UK-licensed agents and doses.
  • Reoperation and mortality risks did not differ between the two anticoagulant groups.
  • Switching to DOACs for VTE prophylaxis after THA could save the NHS an estimated £8.6 million per year.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Aims To evaluate differences in the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from conception to 13 December 2025, for any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy (VTE risk) and safety (bleeding risk) of LMWH and DOACs after elective THA. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) of VTE, bleeding, reoperation, and mortality risks were assessed. Results A total of 22 RCTs involving 28,112 participants were included. The risk of VTE in the DOAC group was lower compared with the LMWH group (OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.82); p = 0.002), driven by a reduction in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk (OR 0.60 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.86); p = 0.008). The findings remained consistent in the subgroup analysis restricted to anticoagulants and dosages licensed for use in the UK. Overall bleeding risk was higher in the DOAC group (OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.38); p = 0.023), but no difference was seen when comparing only UK-licensed anticoagulants and doses (OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.18); p = 0.279). Reoperation risk (OR 1.21 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.93); p = 0.351) and mortality (OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.46 to 2.33); p = 0.937) did not differ between groups. Conclusion DOACs reduce the risk of VTE and DVT following elective THA compared with LMWH without increasing bleeding risk, for UK-licensed agents and doses. Switching to DOACs could save the NHS £8.6 million per year. New clinical trials are needed to compare the safety and efficacy of UK-licensed DOACs and LWMH with modern postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2026;108-B(11):1294–1304.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Bone & Joint Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Internal Medicine

Internal MedicineMedicine