PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Molecular Sciences· 2026Q1

Chronic Stress Attenuates the Glucocorticoid Receptor Transcriptional Programme in the Danio rerio Telencephalon

Maksim V. Shamshurin, Maksim A. Grabchuk, Vladislav A. Shatilov, Olga B. Tseilikman et al.

Short summary

Reanalysis of zebrafish telencephalon RNA-seq data reveals chronic unpredictable stress causes a coordinated, mirror-symmetric shift in glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transcription, with receptor-induced genes downregulated and receptor-repressed genes upregulated (p ≈ 0.001).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Reanalysis of zebrafish telencephalon RNA-seq data after chronic unpredictable stress identified 275 differentially expressed genes.
  • Chronic stress induced a mirror-symmetric shift in glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transcription.
  • Receptor-induced gene sets were downregulated, and receptor-repressed gene sets were upregulated (p ≈ 0.001 for both).
  • Gene-level artifacts related to epidermal content and genomic clustering were identified and addressed.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

We reanalysed public RNA-seq data from the telencephalon of adult zebrafish after 14 days of chronic unpredictable stress. The deposited runs concatenate pooled libraries, hiding the replicates; we recovered the library boundaries from the block structure of unaligned reads and realigned to GRCz11 with splicing enabled. Unique alignment rose from 63.7–64.2% to 80.6–81.6%, and 275 genes were differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05), 101 of the 155 reported previously and 174 new, with effect sizes matching the published ones (ρ = 0.754). Against gene sets from an nr3c1 knockout, the data show a coordinated, mirror-symmetric shift in receptor-dependent transcription—the receptor-induced set down, the receptor-repressed set up (p ≈ 0.001 for both)—while the original study reported cortisol at control level; “receptor-dependent” denotes set membership, not receptor occupancy. Two artefacts constrain the reading of individual genes: epidermal content differs between groups while neuronal content does not, and the gene list is clustered in the genome far beyond chance. Removing the 85 flagged genes (of 275) leaves the receptor-level result intact (p = 0.0008 and 0.0014) but withdraws the conclusions on keratins and barrier structures. That removal addresses gene-level artefact, not sample composition, which six libraries cannot settle: a between-group difference in tissue composition remains an alternative explanation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Behavioral Neuroscience

Behavioral NeuroscienceNeuroscience