Cultural Sociology· 2026Q1
Boundary Trouble: Struggles for Aesthetic Sphere Autonomy in Norway
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Norwegian culture controversies reveal aesthetic sphere actors struggling for autonomy against perceived threats from state, market, civil, intimate, and religious spheres.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Norwegian culture controversies demonstrate struggles for aesthetic sphere autonomy.
- State, market, civil, intimate, and religious spheres are perceived as threats to aesthetic autonomy.
- Key figures transform aesthetic discussions into public controversies.
- Repair activities are used to restore legitimate relations between social spheres.
- Inter-sphere legitimacy is context-dependent and involves numerous actors.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article discusses major culture controversies occurring in Norway over the last decades as instances of boundary blurring between the aesthetic and non-aesthetic spheres, focusing on aesthetic sphere actors’ struggles for autonomy. Drawing on influential sociological theories, it examines how the spheres of state, market, civil, intimate relations, and religion are perceived as threatening aesthetic sphere autonomy, both by aesthetic sphere and non-aesthetic sphere actors. The analysis identifies key figures who are able to transform aesthetic sphere discussions, practices, and decisions into public sphere controversies, and it explores the repair activities used to restore legitimate relations between social spheres. Finally, it assesses whether the aesthetic sphere’s legitimate relations with other spheres are characterized as autonomous or semi-autonomous, and how current relations are evaluated by actors both inside and outside the sphere of aesthetics. The article demonstrates that contemporary struggles for aesthetic sphere autonomy are complex and involve numerous actors, and that the legitimacy of inter-sphere relations is context dependent.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cultural Sociology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Sociology and Political Science
Sociology and Political ScienceSocial Sciences