PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Anesthesiology· 2026Q2

Operational impact and workflow optimization of a virtual pre-anesthesia clinic: a retrospective observational study

Rafat Elnawajha, Ayman Mohammad AlAhdal, Saud Alrawkan

Short summary

A hybrid virtual pre-anesthesia clinic (VPAC) reduced avoidable same-day surgical cancellations by 66.0% (from 0.297% to 0.101%) between 2019 and 2024, despite a significant increase in surgical volume and patient acuity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Avoidable anesthesia-related same-day cancellations decreased by 66.0% (relative risk 0.34, p=0.002) after implementing a hybrid VPAC.
  • The number of elective surgical cases increased from 8,746 in 2019 to 11,871 in 2024.
  • The proportion of higher-acuity patients (ASA III+) increased from 23.6% to 26.4% (p < 0.001).
  • Virtual pathways (triage tele-clinic and Virtual PAC) managed 6.5% of patients in 2024, with the majority (93.6%) still using the physical PAC.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Pre-anesthesia clinics (PAC) are essential for optimizing patient care and reducing same-day surgical cancellations. Traditional physical clinics face challenges in capacity and patient convenience, and virtual pre-anesthesia clinic (VPAC) models have emerged internationally as a potential solution. This study evaluates the operational impact of a hybrid VPAC implemented at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing two periods: a baseline period (2019) using a traditional physical PAC and a post-intervention period (2024) following implementation of a hybrid VPAC workflow. Elective cases under anesthesia care were compared (8,746 in 2019; 11,871 in 2024) after exclusion of emergency cases and procedures without anesthesia attendance. The primary outcome was the rate of avoidable, system-attributable anesthesia-related same-day cancellations (those due to incomplete preoperative workup). Secondary outcomes included patient volumes across triage pathways and the risk profile of the surgical population. The avoidable anesthesia-related cancellation rate decreased from 0.297% (26/8,746) in 2019 to 0.101% (12/11,871) in 2024, a 66.0% relative reduction (relative risk 0.34; 95% CI 0.17–0.67; p = 0.002). In 2024, the VPAC workflow managed 12,857 unique patients: 218 (1.7%) via Pathway 1 (Triage tele-clinic), 611 (4.8%) via Pathway 2 (Virtual PAC), and 12,028 (93.6%) via Pathway 3 (Physical PAC). The surgical case mix changed significantly between periods ( p < 0.001), and the risk profile shifted toward higher acuity (ASA III+ increased from 23.6% to 26.4%, p < 0.001). The implementation of a hybrid VPAC workflow was associated with a significant reduction in avoidable anesthesia-related same-day cancellations, even as surgical volume and patient acuity increased. Although most patients continued to require physical assessment, the virtual pathways provided efficient triage and clearance for a defined subset of patients, consistent with international literature.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Anesthesiology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Emergency Medical Services

Emergency Medical ServicesHealth Professions