PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PLoS Biology· 2026Q1

Viral disease outcomes are indistinguishable between experimentally infected bats and rodents

Maxwell J. Farrell, Samantha K. Tucker, Nardus Mollentze, Daniel G. Streicker

Short summary

Synthesizing 86 years of experimental data (54 viruses, 85 species, >5,600 animals), disease severity and mortality in bats infected with diverse viruses were indistinguishable from rodents, challenging the notion of unique bat antiviral defenses.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Disease occurrence, mortality likelihood, and severity in bats infected with diverse viruses were indistinguishable from rodents.
  • This pattern held true for bat-specific viruses in bats and rodent-specific viruses in rodents, and for infections lacking shared co-evolutionary history.
  • Disease outcomes were primarily shaped by experimental design, viral host range, and evolutionary context, not inherent bat antiviral traits.
  • The findings challenge the idea that bats have unusual antiviral traits and suggest their immune systems evolved via conventional co-evolution.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

A common explanation for bats being a conspicuous source of zoonotic viruses is their purported ability to coexist with viruses without suffering overt disease. Widespread acceptance of the idea that bats have unusual antiviral traits has catalyzed the discovery of unique features of bat immune systems which may have translational value as broad-spectrum antivirals, particularly if they evolved as a byproduct of bats' unique life history rather than through conventional co-evolutionary processes. Surprisingly, whether bats compared to other host groups suffer less disease from co-evolved viruses or from viruses generally has not been formally assessed. Here, synthesizing 86 years of experimental infections, involving 54 viruses, 85 host species, and over 5,600 animals, we document disease in bats following inoculation by taxonomically diverse viruses, including ones that are relatively benign in humans. The occurrence of overt disease, the likelihood of mortality, and the severity of disease in bats were indistinguishable from those experienced by rodents, another group associated with many zoonotic viruses. These patterns were consistent when considering only bat-associated viruses inoculated into bats and rodent-associated viruses inoculated into rodents and among inoculations which lacked shared co-evolutionary history. Instead, disease outcomes following infection were shaped by experimental design, viral host range, and evolutionary context. Unexceptional disease in bats from novel or co-evolved infections suggests that order-level host life history traits such as flight have inconsistent consequences for antiviral immunity and highlights the need to evaluate the functional properties of putatively unique features of bat immunity in vivo. While these results do not exclude the possibility of developing broader-acting or more potent antivirals from bat immune systems or diminish the potential value of mechanistic insights into bat immunity, they suggest that bat immune systems were shaped by conventional co-evolutionary processes rather than through unique circumstances that endow exceptional antiviral defenses.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS Biology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsAgricultural and Biological Sciences