Ain Shams Engineering Journal· 2026Q1
Multi-response prediction and uncertainty quantification of blasting vibration using WOA-optimized XGBoost and conformal inference
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A novel framework integrates WOA-XGBoost and conformal prediction to simultaneously predict peak particle velocity (PPV), dominant frequency (f), and vibration duration (T) from blasting, achieving R 2 of 0.899, 0.880, and 0.967 respectively, with quantified uncertainty.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A unified framework predicts PPV, dominant frequency (f), and vibration duration (T) simultaneously using WOA-optimized XGBoost.
- Conformal prediction with an embedded Random Forest error model quantifies prediction uncertainty without a separate calibration set.
- The model achieved high R 2 values: 0.899 for PPV, 0.880 for f, and 0.967 for T on a test set.
- Prediction intervals showed good coverage (e.g., 92.86% for PPV at 90% nominal confidence) and distinct, target-dependent uncertainty structures.
- External validation on a Xinjiang iron mine dataset confirmed robust generalization with R 2 values above 0.865 for all indicators.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Existing studies on blast-induced vibration prediction predominantly focus on a single response indicator, leaving multi-parameter characterization and predictive uncertainty quantification insufficiently addressed. This study proposes a unified framework that integrates Kennard–Stone (KS) sample partitioning, Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA)-tuned Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and out-of-fold (OOF) calibrated adaptive conformal prediction. Separate WOA-XGBoost models are developed to predict peak particle velocity (PPV), dominant frequency (f), and vibration duration (T). To quantify prediction uncertainty, a Random Forest-based error-scale model is embedded within the conformal prediction framework, enabling input-dependent interval widths without requiring a separately held-out calibration subset. On an independent hold-out test set, the proposed framework achieves coefficients of determination (R 2 ) of 0.899, 0.880, and 0.967 for PPV, f, and T, respectively, outperforming benchmark models in RMSE and MAE. At a nominal 90% confidence level, the prediction interval coverage probabilities are 92.86% for PPV, 92.86% for f, and 89.29% for T, with normalized interval widths and coverage-width-based criteria revealing distinct, target-dependent uncertainty structures. External validation using an independent dataset from a Xinjiang iron mine yields R 2 values of 0.865, 0.915, and 0.921, confirming robust generalization across varying geological conditions. The proposed framework provides an engineering-oriented, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware decision-support strategy for blasting vibration risk assessment, demonstrating the practical applicability of optimized ensemble learning combined with conformal inference.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Building and Construction
Building and ConstructionEngineering