Discover Sustainability· 2026Q1
Farmers perceived risks distinguishing domestic wastewater users from non-users in the Sistan Plain of Iran
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Ethical, educational/awareness, and sociocultural risks, not health or policy risks, most strongly distinguished farmers who use domestic wastewater from those who do not in Iran's Sistan Plain (n=361).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Ethical risks (standardized coefficient = 0.671) were the strongest differentiator between domestic wastewater users and non-users.
- Educational/awareness (0.512) and sociocultural (0.467) risks also significantly distinguished the two farmer groups.
- Health and policy risks had minimal impact on farmers' decisions regarding wastewater use.
- A total of 361 farmers (163 users, 198 non-users) were surveyed using discriminant analysis.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The water scarcity crisis is a fundamental challenge for agriculture in arid and semi-arid regions like Iran. Using domestic wastewater as an alternative water source can play an essential role in alleviating pressure on water resources. However, farmers’ perceptions of the risks associated with wastewater significantly influence their decision to adopt or reject this technology. This research explores how perceived risks differentiate farmers who use domestic wastewater from those who do not. The research is an analytical descriptive study conducted through survey techniques. The statistical population includes farmers in the Sistan Plain, Iran. A total of 361 farmers (163 wastewater users and 198 non-users) were surveyed, and discriminant analysis was used to identify which perceived risks best distinguish the two groups. Data were collected using a questionnaire whose validity was confirmed through face validity (expert assessment of question clarity and appropriateness) and content validity (systematic evaluation of item relevance to research objectives), and whose reliability was verified by calculating Cronbach’s alpha during a pilot study. Results reveal that ethical (standardized coefficient = 0.671), educational and awareness (0.512), and sociocultural (0.467) risks were the most influential in distinguishing user farmers from non-user farmers. Conversely, health and policy risks had minimal impact on farmers’ decisions—likely due to limited awareness of health hazards and perceived lack of control over policy changes—suggesting that policymakers should prioritize sociocultural interventions over health campaigns or regulatory adjustments. These findings indicate that social, cultural, and ethical concerns are more important than scientific and environmental considerations regarding wastewater use. Additionally, legal and monitoring risks, as well as supply-chain-related risks, also played a role in influencing farmers’ decisions. In conclusion, policymakers seeking to promote wastewater adoption in the Sistan Plain should prioritize sociocultural acceptance and awareness-building over health campaigns or regulatory adjustments, as farmers’ decisions are primarily shaped by social and ethical considerations. Not applicable.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Discover Sustainability, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Waste Management and DisposalEnvironmental Science