PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Economic Theory· 2026Q1

Strategic ignorance and information design

Ina Taneva, Thomas Wiseman

Short summary

Information designers may need to account for agents strategically ignoring signals, as this can lead to outcomes misaligned with the designer's intent, even when maximizing agent payoffs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Agents strategically ignoring signals can lead to misaligned outcomes in information design.
  • A new equilibrium concept, 'robust correlated equilibrium', is introduced to address strategic ignorance.
  • Optimal information design may involve providing redundant or counterproductive information.
  • Asymmetric information structures can be optimal in symmetric environments when strategic ignorance is considered.
  • Sequential communication may harm the designer's objectives.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

We study information design in strategic settings when agents can publicly commit to not view their private signals. Ignoring the constraints that agents must be willing to view their signals may lead to substantial divergence between the designer’s intent and actual outcomes, even in the case where the designer seeks to maximize the agents' payoffs. We introduce the approprite equilibrium concept — robust correlated equilibrium — and characterize implementable distributions over states and actions. Requiring robustness to strategic ignorance can explain qualitative properties that standard information design cannot: the designer may provide redundant or even conterproductive information, asymmetric information structures may be strictly optimal in symmetric environments, providing information conditional on players' choices rather than all at once may hurt the designer, and communication between players may help her. Optimality may require that players ignore their signals with positive probability.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Economic Theory, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Management Science and Operations Research

Management Science and Operations ResearchDecision Sciences