BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation· 2026Q1· Review
Effects of sleep manipulation on athletic performance, cognitive function, and recovery: a systematic review of experimental studies
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Extending sleep by 9.5m in shuttle runs, reducing fatigue by 8.1%, and improving reaction time by 43.6ms, while sleep restriction decreased endurance by ~3% and harmed cognitive function.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Sleep extension improved shuttle run distance (+9.5m), reduced fatigue (-8.1%), and shortened reaction time (-43.6ms).
- Sleep extension improved endurance by ~3% and sprint times by -0.7s, with accuracy increasing by ~9%.
- Sleep restriction decreased endurance by ~3% and negatively impacted cognitive performance and fatigue levels.
- Longer daytime naps (60-90 min) enhanced muscle contraction (+74N) and reduced perceived fatigue (-1.9 units) and sleepiness (-4.33 units).
- Brief naps (20 min) had variable effects, with some studies showing minor sprint time deficits (+0.026s).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Sleep is important for recovery, cognitive and physical performance. Sleep manipulation (sleep extension, napping and sleep restriction) is a new way to enhance performance for athletes. This systematic review explored the effects of sleep manipulation on physical performance, cognitive performance and psychophysiological responses in the active and athletic population. The literature was searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for eligible studies published between 2011 and 2025, yielding 1,586 records. After removing duplicates and applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 15 intervention studies (randomized controlled trials and crossover) were identified. Data were extracted and the results synthesised in a structured narrative format due to variability in the designs and measures used. Sleep extension led to enhanced performance, including greater distance run in the shuttle run (+ 9.5 m), lower fatigue index (− 8.1%), shorter reaction time (− 43.6 ms), better sprint time (− 0.7 s) and improved accuracy ( ~ + 9%). Sleep extension led to a ~ 3% improvement in endurance, whereas sleep restriction led to a ~ 3% decrease in endurance, alongside higher fatigue and cognitive performance decrements. Daytime napping showed mixed results, with longer naps (60–90 min) enhancing maximum voluntary contraction (+ 74 N), distance (+ 89 m), and lowering perceived fatigue (− 1.9 units) and sleepiness (− 4.33 units). The effects of brief naps (20 min) were variable, with some minor performance deficits (+ 0.026 s in sprint time). Overall, sleep extension was generally associated with favourable physical, cognitive, and recovery-related outcomes, whereas sleep restriction was associated with adverse performance effects. The effects of daytime napping were more context-dependent and appeared to vary according to prior sleep status, nap duration, and subsequent performance demands.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyPsychology