PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· 2026Q1

Dark Energy Survey year 6 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

T. M. C. Abbott, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon et al.

Short summary

The Dark Energy Survey's full six years of data (Y6) yield precise cosmological constraints: $S_8 = 0.789^{+0.012}_{-0.012}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.333^{+0.023}_{-0.028}$ in flat $\Lambda$CDM, showing a 1.8$\sigma$ difference with Planck CMB data.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • DES Y6 analysis combines galaxy shapes, clustering, and cross-correlation from ~5000 deg$^2$.
  • Flat $\Lambda$CDM constraints: $S_8 = 0.789^{+0.012}_{-0.012}$, $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.333^{+0.023}_{-0.028}$.
  • A 1.8$\sigma$ parameter difference exists between DES Y6 and combined CMB (Planck, ACT, SPT) data.
  • Combining all DES probes with CMB yields tightest $\Lambda$CDM constraints: $S_8 = 0.806^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.302^{+0.003}_{-0.003}$.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

We present cosmology results combining galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing measured in the full six years (Y6) of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) covering $\sim$5000 deg$^2$. We perform a large-scale structure analysis using three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear from 140 million source galaxy shapes, (ii) galaxy clustering of 9 million lens galaxy positions, and (iii) galaxy-galaxy lensing from their cross-correlation. We model the data in flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM cosmologies. The combined analysis yields $S_8\equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.789^{+0.012}_{-0.012}$ and matter density $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.333^{+0.023}_{-0.028}$ in $Λ$CDM (68\% CL), where $σ_8$ is the clustering amplitude. These constraints show a (full-space) parameter difference of 1.8$σ$ from a combination of cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy datasets from Planck 2018, ACT-DR6, and SPT-3G DR1. Projected only into $S_8$ the difference is $2.6σ$. In $w$CDM the Y6 3$\times$2pt results yield $S_8 = 0.782^{+0.021}_{-0.020}$, $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.325^{+0.032}_{-0.035}$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w = -1.12^{+0.26}_{-0.20}$. For the first time, we combine all DES dark-energy probes: 3$\times$2pt, SNe Ia, BAO and Clusters. In $Λ$CDM this combination yields a $2.8σ$ parameter difference from the CMB. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt with other low-redshift datasets (DESI DR2 BAO, DES SNe Ia, SPT clusters), we find a 2.3$σ$ parameter difference with CMB. A joint fit of Y6 3$\times$2pt, CMB, and those low-redshift datasets produces the tightest $Λ$CDM constraints to date: $S_8 = 0.806^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.302^{+0.003}_{-0.003}$, $h = 0.683^{+0.003}_{-0.002}$, and $\sum m_ν< 0.14$ eV (95\% CL). In $w$CDM, this combination yields $w = -0.981^{+0.021}_{-0.022}$.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Physical review. D/Physical review. D., 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy and AstrophysicsPhysics and Astronomy