PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Production and Operations Management· 2026Q1

EXPRESS: Do You Lose When You Sell Loose? Impact of Unpackaged Sales on Profit and Waste

Ismail Kirci, Dorothée Honhon, Alp Muharremoglu

Short summary

Introducing loose sales of unpackaged perishable products can increase retailer profit and decrease consumer-level waste, but it may not always be optimal and can increase absolute waste.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Retailers can increase profit and reduce consumer waste by offering loose sales of unpackaged perishable goods.
  • Loose sales are not always optimal for profit and can increase total absolute waste.
  • When optimally introduced, loose sales are preferred by low-consumption consumers, and packages by high-consumption consumers.
  • Offering loose sales can lower package prices for high-consumption consumers without changing package size.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Industry experts frequently mention that package size adjustments are necessary to curb food waste and in particular, loose sales, i.e., the sale of unpackaged products by the unit or by weight, are often promoted as a greener alternative to packaged sales. Given the recent trend towards more in-store prepared foods, retailers increasingly find themselves having to decide how to sell the products they prepare on-site. In this study, we consider a retailer selling a perishable product under two possible formats: in packages of a fixed size or in loose format, which allows consumers to buy the exact quantity they wish. The retailer sets prices and package size to maximize profit while consumers maximize their expected utility. We solve for the optimal prices and package size. We find that it is not always optimal for the retailer to introduce a loose sale option because, in some instances, more profit can be earned by selling only packages, forcing consumers to buy more than their ideal quantity, leading to excessive waste at the consumer level. When loose is introduced optimally, it is purchased by low-consumption-needs consumers, leaving the packages for high-consumption-needs consumers. We demonstrate the robustness of our results by considering different levels and types of consumer heterogeneity. Our results indicate that adding loose always increases absolute waste, which may question the general notion that loose sales are always environmentally-friendly. However, we find that in many cases, adding loose yields a win-win situation higher profits for the retailer and lower relative waste at the consumer level. Further, adding a loose sale option often lowers the package price without affecting the package size, hereby benefiting the high-consumption-needs consumers. Our results suggest that policymakers should consider legislation promoting the sale of high-demand perishable items in loose format.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Production and Operations Management, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Management Information SystemsBusiness, Management and Accounting