Frontiers in Medicine· 2026Q1· Review
Digital health interventions for psoriasis management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials (1,195 patients) found digital health interventions did not significantly improve psoriasis severity (PASI scores) or dermatology-specific quality of life (DLQI scores).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Digital health interventions did not significantly improve PASI-family disease severity scores (Hedges’ g: −0.07).
- Digital health interventions did not significantly improve Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores (Hedges’ g: −0.12).
- Eleven randomized controlled trials with 1,195 psoriasis patients were included in the analysis.
- Narrative synthesis suggested potential improvements in treatment adherence, disease knowledge, and self-management.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Objective To systematically evaluate the effects of digital health interventions on disease severity and dermatology-specific quality of life in patients with psoriasis. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) through the Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed) from inception to April 2026. Randomized controlled trials of psoriasis management interventions in which digital technology was the core component or a major component were eligible. The primary outcome was a PASI-family disease severity score. The secondary outcome was the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Standardized mean differences were pooled as Hedges' g using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses and structured narrative synthesis were also performed. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 1,195 patients with psoriasis were included. Six studies contributed data to at least one prespecified quantitative synthesis. Digital health interventions did not significantly improve PASI-family scores (Hedges’ g : −0.07; 95% CI: −0.28 to 0.14; I 2 = 0.0%) or DLQI scores (Hedges’ g : −0.12; 95% CI: −0.46 to 0.21; I 2 = 59.8%). Sensitivity analyses did not materially change the findings. Narrative synthesis suggested that digital health interventions may improve process-related outcomes, including treatment adherence, disease knowledge, self-management, and access to follow-up care. Conclusions Current randomized evidence does not show that digital health interventions significantly improve skin lesion or symptom severity or dermatology-specific quality of life in patients with psoriasis. Nonsignificant differences should be interpreted as evidence of clinical equivalency rather than treatment failure, given that digital health interventions may maintain standard-of-care results while reducing travel burden, costs, and waiting times. Digital health interventions are better viewed as an adjunct to usual psoriasis care than as a replacement for face-to-face care or pharmacological treatment.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
ImmunologyImmunology and Microbiology