PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Reviews in the Neurosciences· 2026Q1· Review

Mapping three decades of consciousness research in neuroscience: a scientometric synthesis of intellectual evolution and emerging frontiers

Dong Ming, Haiqing Yu, Jianghong He, Di Haibo et al.

Short summary

A scientometric analysis of 22,836 neuroscience publications (1998-2025) reveals three main research paths: neural correlates of conscious contents/states, internal awareness/self-consciousness, and integrative approaches. Emerging hotspots include neural mechanisms, subjective experience, disorders of consciousness (DoC), and interoception.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Identified three major research paths in consciousness neuroscience: neural correlates, internal awareness, and integrative approaches.
  • Emerging research hotspots include neural mechanisms, subjective experience, disorders of consciousness (DoC), and interoception.
  • Analysis based on 22,836 publications and 639,975 citations from 1998-2025.
  • Bibliometric links between DoC and subjective experience/interoception are notably sparse.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Over the past three decades, consciousness research in neuroscience has expanded into a broad and increasingly diverse field. Despite significant progress, a quantitative understanding of how these research areas have collectively evolved has remained limited. In this study, we conducted a large-scale scientometric analysis of consciousness research in neuroscience based on 22,836 publications and 639,975 cited references retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection spanning 1998-2025. We identified three major research paths: neural correlates of conscious contents and states, internal awareness and self-consciousness, and integrative approaches bridging these two paths. Emerging hotspots included neural mechanisms of consciousness, subjective experience, disorders of consciousness (DoC), and interoception. Despite increasing boundary-spanning research across different areas, bibliometric connections between DoC and other major topics, particularly subjective experience and interoception, remain comparatively sparse. These findings provide a field-level synthesis of consciousness research in neuroscience, offering a quantitative framework for understanding its development and emerging research directions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyDecision Sciences