PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Natural hazards and earth system sciences· 2026Q1

Distinguishing run-up height from pressure distribution during avalanche impact on narrow obstacles: mechanisms and semi-empirical prediction from three-dimensional simulations

Michael Josef Kohler, Johan Gaume, Christophe Ancey, Betty Sovilla

Short summary

Avalanche impact pressure height is distinct from run-up height and remains velocity-independent, even in fast flows, due to momentum redirection at a granular dead zone.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Run-up height and pressure height are distinct quantities in avalanche impacts on narrow obstacles.
  • In fast flows, run-up height is dominated by an inertia-driven component scaling with velocity squared.
  • Pressure height remains velocity-independent, governed by flow deflection at a granular dead zone.
  • New semi-empirical formulations are proposed for both run-up height and pressure height, incorporating rheology and velocity independence respectively.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract. In current engineering practice, run-up height is assumed to define the vertical extent of significant impact pressure of snow avalanches on narrow obstacles, such as cableway masts or transmission towers. Laboratory experiments indicate that this assumption is invalid in fast, inertia-driven regimes; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, limiting the physical basis for improving design practice. To clarify these mechanisms and refine engineering formulations, we conduct a comprehensive numerical investigation using a three-dimensional Material Point Method, varying avalanche velocity and rheological parameters. Our results substantiate that run-up height and the vertical extent of significant impact pressure, which we term pressure height, are distinct quantities governed by different mechanisms. Both include a gravity-driven component controlled by avalanche rheology, largely independent of flow velocity. In fast flows, however, the two quantities diverge: run-up height gains a dominant inertia-driven component scaling with the square of flow velocity, with avalanche rheology controlling energy dissipation. Pressure height, by contrast, remains velocity-independent. This divergence arises from flow deflection at a granular dead zone near the obstacle base, where momentum is redirected, and impact pressure concentrates. Building on these distinctions, we propose separate semi-empirical formulations for run-up height and pressure height. The run-up formulation follows the structure of the widely used Swiss avalanche guidelines, but replaces simplified avalanche-type classifications with a rheological parametrization. The pressure-height relation adopts the same framework, while reflecting its distinct, velocity-independent governing mechanism.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawEnvironmental Science