Effect of Wall Motion Sampling on CFD ‐Derived Left Atrial Flow Metrics

Abstract

ABSTRACT The temporal resolution of medical imaging sequences used to drive patient‐specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations remains limited, typically providing 10–20 frames per cardiac cycle. Therefore, temporal interpolation to reconstruct left atrial (LA) wall motion and boundary conditions is required, but its impact on hemodynamic predictions has not been systematically characterized. To investigate this, we constructed high‐temporal‐resolution reference wall‐motion data using electromechanical (EM) simulations on five patient‐specific atrial geometries with a history of atrial fibrillation. We then generated temporally downsampled datasets to emulate clinical frame rates (5, 10, 20, and 40 frames per cycle) and performed CFD simulations to isolate the effects of temporal undersampling on hemodynamic metrics. The focus was placed on kinetic energy, KE, and residence time, , particularly in the left atrial appendage (LAA), where thrombosis is most likely to occur. We employed an immersed boundary method to prescribe the wall motion and computed blood through a passive scalar transport equation. Results indicate that while global LA hemodynamic indices were marginally affected by the frame rate (errors ), LAA metrics were more sensitive with errors up to 31% compared to reference values. The results based on 20 and 40 frames per cycle yielded favorable agreement with reference results, while 5‐ and 10‐frame reconstructions showed larger, though not systematically biased, deviations from the reference. Importantly, patient ranking by blood‐stasis indices was largely preserved. The analysis suggests that patient‐specific LA reconstructions derived from dynamic CT imaging provide a reliable basis for estimating LAA blood‐stasis indices. Higher frame rates ( per cycle) offer improved quantitative accuracy, while lower temporal resolutions may remain informative for patient stratification purposes, where relative ranking is more relevant than absolute accuracy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 2026 · DOI ↗